Fwd: Re: [RC] Bare VS Shod: There must be a compromise - Lori Bertolucci
Lori Bertolucci <loribertolucci@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:04:16 -0800 (PST) From: Lori Bertolucci <loribertolucci@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [RC] Bare VS Shod: There must be a compromise To: steelsidedown <Steelsidedown@xxxxxxx>
Jen, you are correct. I misspoke there. It is the wall you are rasping.
I don't even touch the sole of my barefoot horses, except when absolutely necessary.
But I have seen flat soled hooves, and not just on foundered horses. One reason for going barefoot. And that is what happens, as far as I am concerned, when you have a farrier that is trimming incorrectly.
Lori
steelsidedown <Steelsidedown@xxxxxxx> wrote:
<<<<<<<<<<On a "regular" trim, the hoof sole is rasped flat to accommodate the shoe, and most farriers will trim a barefoot horse the same way.>>>>>>>>>>>>
What!?!?!??
Something is very wrong if you are able to rasp the SOLE. The sole should never be that low (close to the ground) the sole shouldn't be = bearing any weight. (yes, I do see this on occasion - on severely foundered horses, nothing rideable)
A "regular trim" in my world, consists of nipping the extra hoof wall, paring out the sole with a hoof knife, then rasping the hoof wall even and balanced -- keeping a nice concave cup shape. (Thus keeping weight off the sole and onto the hoof wall and frog where it
belongs.) This is the method whether adding shoes or not ....