Endurance.Net Ridecamp Archives

Joe,

The selection process used is somewhat similar to the one developed for 
the selection of the ETZ teams over the past few PAEC/NAEC. It is based 
on head to head competition with points accumulated based on finish in 
predefined selection rides. There is no politics.

JT posted the link.

One of the shortfalls of a pure points system surfaced in the last NAEC 
where a good horse/rider that have a single bad day had the choice of 
taking on another 100 shortly after they did one and shortly prior to 
the competition. This rider decided to let a British friend ride his 
horse for GB in the NAEC and the horse metaled in the NAEC. This does 
not seem to be in the best interest of anyone.

The remedy in the WEC procedures is to select to a "National Team" using 
head to head completion and at that point turn the team over the 
management (coaches, vets, etc.) for final selection of the squad. This 
is very similar to a track team, for example where the coach picks the 
four guys to run the relay from the team based on the factors at hand on 
the day. It is also quite reasonable and while there is always a chance 
that politics will surface in anything - the ultimate responsibility 
will rest on the management who should get the blame/praise for the 
performance of the team.

In the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta in the 4x100 meter relay, there was 
pressure to replace one of the team members with Carl Lewis. Lewis 
placed fifth in the relay team selection for the even in the trails. He 
was at Atlanta in the Long Jump. The reasoning was Lewis was a seasoned 
veteran who had good skills in the handling of the baton. His speed was 
still good, and when paired with the other three he would be running 
with the team would be dead on favorite. However, the coaches hands were 
tied and Lewis could not be on the relay team - unless one of the other 
runners could not compete. The guy Lewis would have replaced had little 
experience in relays - especially at that level. He bobbled the baton on 
the hand-off and lost valuable time. The US lost the gold metal to 
Canada that day because of that bobble.

IMO the best way is to chose the squad by head to head competition and 
let the management select from the squad the team for race day. That is 
what is done today in the USEF. It might need some tweaking but in is a 
solid approach. If it doesn't work then one has to take a hard look at 
the management leading upto and on the day of the event.

I think the problems we have had in the last few WEC's has more to do 
with the fact that the rest of the world has caught up and in many cases 
surpassed the US program. This is not unusual in sports. Look at 
international basketball. In 1992 when the "dream team" of NBA all 
starts played in the Olympics. At that time all the other countries were 
honored to just play against them. The opposing players would get the 
dream teams autographs after the games. They walked away with the Olympics.

The rest of the world went to work and as a result in the last Olympics 
the US NBA allstart team had to work hard just to win the Bronze and 
they were lucky to do that. The rest of the world just got a lot better. 
I think bottom line that is what has happened in endurance.

Truman

Joe Long wrote:
> Among other things, that would take most of the politics out of the 
> selection process. Which may be why it won't be done that way. ;^>


--

“The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher 
esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.” 
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Dawn


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=