Re: [RC] New Poll Question on SERA Website - Truman PrevattJoe Long wrote:It's early - it's only been up a few hours. . Formulate a question, sent it to me or Teri and we'll put it up.On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:37:14 -0500, Truman Prevatt <tprevatt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: As far as part of the weight, there are arguments both ways. If you allow tack, then you need to be very specific. At a ride I ran some years back, a woman showed up for BC with a saddle pad that was dripping wet. No it wasn't from sweat, she had soaked it to get a few pounds. She got all hacked off when I sent her away to bring back a different pad. Her water bottles - all four of them were full. This wasn't a ride across the desert with 50 miles between stops, there was not need for more than one or two water bottles. After all, it's not the absolute weight that is used in the BC computation, it's the weight difference. If everyone weighted without tack, that difference would be basically maintained. Truman Diane Trefethen wrote: -- "It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity." - Albert Einstein =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|