Let's just get it out on the table.
The publications editor of AERC/Endurance News is NOT an endurance
rider! This is nothing PERSONAL. In example, the photo which
was chosen as January's cover was ultimately rejected last minute (after
much work on my part in image prep) because the helmet strap on a junior
wasn't tight enough. Oversight like that is important, to make sure
our journal which goes out to people worldwide properly represents the
viewpoint of the organization.
In further example, Kim Fuess'
article on negative splits was rejected when first submitted. She
went to one of the AERC officers to get it reconsidered, and it was
ultimately published, I think, as is. Maybe you should consider that
route.
If you are making a joke, make some allowance for the lack of
nuance in typewritten characters, and use a SMILEY or comment <grin>
to insure you aren't misunderstood. Yeah, it may be overkill, but it
will prevent knee-jerk reactions.
Lynne intolerant of extreme
viewpoints whether political or experiential-- and it is extremely gorgeous
here, 72 degrees, I shot glorious poppies today, so don't accuse me of not
getting out enough on my currently barefoot horses
On Feb 4, 2005,
at 5:59 PM, Shari wrote:
> Cynthia and Truman are perfect examples
of how rabid people can get on > this subject. > Did they even
read ANY of what I said, or just pick out ONE sentence > to beat me
with? > A sentence that was said half in jest. But there seems to be a
> distinct lack of a sense > of humor on this site as well. I
have to wonder how most of you even > find the time > to ride
when you obviously spend hours picking apart every post on > this site.
Get a life.
