Re: [RC] Pull Codes - k s swigartFrom: <heidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> LOL! Yeah, that's a legitimate "RO"--er, "W"--in my book... <g> .... Puhleeze, kat, look at the LOL and the <g>... So...if you meant your above reponse as a joke, then you didn't answer my original question. Which of the current AERC pull codes should be put down when a rider withdraws from the competition because the horse isn't having fun? This time, tell us what you really think, instead of just making a joke. I didn't mean the question as a joke, it is a perfect example of the many times that I have withdrawn my horse from a ride, and it is why there are so many RO pulls in the AERC stats (which is how this whole discussion got started). I will agree that very few of the RO pulls listed in the stats are truely because there is something sufficiently wrong with the rider such that the rider is unwilling/unable to go on. And I doubt that most of them are put there by vets who don't want the public records of their friends horses to look bad, but rather it is a "catch all" for "the rider decided not to go on because of some indescribable something that they thought might be wrong with the horse." And since the horse did NOT go on, nobody ever had a chance to find out if/whether there really was something wrong, or what it was, since most of the time the horse is back to its normal self within a few hours (which is what happened in the instance with my horse that wasn't having fun, a few hours later she was doing arabesques tied to the trailer desperate to go some more). And even if you do find out later (because whatever was wrong progressed and has now become obvious), that still isn't why the rider pulled the horse. Additionally, there is no "RO-OT" and I have on many occasions seen people pull their horses from the competition, not because they were over time at that particular vet check (if a vet check doesn't have any official cut off times, then the only place a horse can be pulled by the officials for being over time is at the finish), but because they were far enough behind schedule that they knew they couldn't ride responsibly and still finish under time, so they withdrew before the finish. It is time for the AERC to go back to what I suspect was the original way that pull codes were handled, before they started publishing them. If a horse is pulled by the officials, then the reason is M (metabolic), L (lame), OT (over time), DQ (disqualified for breaking some other rule). If a horse is cleared by the officials to go on and the rider OPTS not to go on, for whatever reason, then the reason given is RO (rider option); however, since having "rider option" as one of the codes leaves the impression that riders who were pulled by the officials would have opted to go on had they not been disqualified, I suggest that RO be changed to W (withdrawn). kat Orange County, Calif. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|