![]() |
Re: [RC] CRI question - Truman PrevattThere was an article in EN many moons ago by Kerry Ridgeway - the vet who was credited with introducing the CRI to endurance - that basically said that if the horse starts out at about 52 or below, a rise in the CRI is pretty meaningless unless it is dramatic.Another words a 60/68 is much more significant of a potential problem than a 48/60 for example. Truman Jim Holland wrote: The CRI is a useful tool, but there are times when the results can be misleading. For example, here in the SE, the vets seem to get concerned if the second number is 4 or more beats higher than the first number. For example, if the horse starts at 62 and the second number is 66, especially if the horse has a few B’s or lower on other things. -- "The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." Niels Bohr -- Nobel Laureate, Physics =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|