Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

[RC] Women's Group - Ridecamp Guest

Please Reply to: ti Tivers@xxxxxxx or ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
==========================================

"..women that can help other women over issues unique to us in
riding, particularly endurance..."


Since about 80% of endurance riders are women, I submit for consideration if
any "minority" group needs a special list it is the men.

Ed


PS.  Don't take this post too seriously, just as many men would be
embarassed to talk of things related to male equipment I am aware that there
are many women who have issues that they don't want to post about where men
are likely to read.>

No offense taken, Ed, of course. How could you possibly give offense when each 
of your posts covers all the bases and presents no point of view?

However, in defense of logic and accountability, I would have to suggest a more 
realistic breakdown of the majority/minority situation in endurance. For 
instance, without doing actual blood sampling, the empirical evidence suggests 
something more like 80% women, 1% men, and 19% drones in the sport. As always, 
I consider myself to be in the 1% elite category. Otherwise, why bother with 
statistics, eh?

Since women know women far better than men know, or want to know, women, let me 
suggest that a woman attack that 80% number and break it into parts as well. 
One categoy might be, "effective human being". That is, an entity that gets the 
job done. That would be an elite group, of course.

At the opposite end of the spectrum might be "weepers and wailers"--or a more 
scientific name. Of course, that would include most of the drones mentioned 
above.

And we need a scientific name for plain fluff bunnies. Those who cannot 
possibly get the job done because they can't figure out what the job IS--again, 
have to include most of the drones in this category. And Druids and alpha cows. 
Have to have a category for them--but it's still not necessarily gender 
specific--witness Joe and Bob.

And there's the rub, really. Anatomy doesn't seem to be a genuine qualifier in 
the categories I have in mind. You have a kind of bell curve between effective 
and ineffective. The true minority here is the "effective". Those are the ones 
that need to form a club.

Steph, for example, is an effective. But so is John. and there are a bunch of 
effectives that never post on RC--so we need a "reach out" kind of movement to 
attract that downtrodden minority. See my upcoming "100" posts and you'll know 
what they're doing instead of reading and posting here.

ti


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-