![]() |
[RC] Cloning Questions - k s swigartEd said: If you think of it, it is not surprising. Compare two apple trees of the same cultivar. They are the result of vegative propigation (cloning), but they do not have branches of exactly the same size in exactly the same place. Even without pruning, much of the shape of a tree is the result of random events during development not genetics. The good news is that the taste of the fruit is genetically determined so you do get the desired apples. << He is quite right, it is not surprising. Cloned apple trees do not look exactly the same. However, I also beg to differ with respect to his assertion that taste is genetically determined. The taste of a fruit is very much a function of the soil it is grown in, the overall climate it is grown in, the local weather conditions at the time, and when the fruit is picked, to name but a few of the multitude of variables other than genetics that determines the taste of a fruit.... ....ask any wine maker, or even a wine afficianado. A goodly portion of making good wine is in starting with good grapes, and a "good year" for wine is generally determined by the weather, but it is also very much a matter of knowing when to pick them. All apple trees with the same genetic makeup (e.g. every granny smith tree) do not look exactly the same, and even all granny smith apples off of the same tree do not taste exactly the same. This genetic duplicate of Cash is NOT Cash (and never will be). Since the practice of cloning mammals is very much in its experimental stages, nobody could possibly have clue whether and to what extent the genetic duplicate will differ from the original. However, we have LOADS of evidence (because genetic duplicates have existed and been studies for millenia) that suggests that this genetic duplicate will differ from the original quite a bit. However, all that said, with respect to producing more granny smith apple trees, one granny smith tree is as good as the next. So while each tree is different, and will produce fruit that doesn't all taste the same due to environmental conditions, they can all be used pretty much in the same way to be used for grafting. Consequently, this genetic duplicate of Cash, while he may not bear much resemblence to Cash in his own form (he is, after all going to be a stallion so his growth and development will, by definition be very different from the original Cash's growth and development) or capabilities as an endurance horse, he may be more likely to propogate in the same way as the original. So, while it is unlikely that Cash the stallion will look like, act like, or perform like Cash the gelding, he may breed on the same way that Cash the gelding would have had he not been gelded...or had his semen been frozen before he'd been cut so Cash the Gelding could have been bred. However, there is no way we will ever know. There is no way to make any comparisons to find out...and the technology is too new to have any past experience to compare it with. kat Orange County, Calif. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|