![]() |
[RC] Limited Distance vs Competitive Trail - JonniAll I said was that I've learned more from AERC rides in the short time that I've been associated with them. <snip>. I also agree that I want my horse to go through bogs, narrow trails, up and down embankments, cross water with sensibility - basically go where ever I point them. However, the NATRC doesn't teach you that it just judges it.<<<< Funny that one has *learned* something from participating in some endurance rides, but feels that NATRC does not *teach* you, just judges you. Do you not learn something every time you are "judged" in what ever horse event you participate in that has a persons opinion as part of the results? In the show ring, we learn how judges want to see the horse perform for the particular class entered. Even in Halter classes, you learn what the conformation that certain judges like to see in a horse, and go to shows that have a judge that really likes the type of horses one breeds. In NATRC, you learn that a horse that does a trail obstacle calmly, and sensibly, will score better than one who is not listening to the rider, and just blasts through it. After the ride, you get a score card, telling you what the judged saw, and how they scored it. Both in positive and negative points. Even at endurance rides, if a horse is judged for Best Condition, it is based on an opinion of the vet, on the condition of that horse, combined with your weight and ride time. Only the order of finish at an endurance ride is not decided by an opinion, just like timed events at shows and gymkhanas / playdays. As far as camp safety I feel that the NATRC goes a bit overboard. Such as "if water buckets are not secure, horses can knock them over and be without water for the night, or get them tangled in their feet". Heck that is only a problem if you are at an NATRC ride and you are not allowed to touch you horse after 10 pm! <<< Well you see, due to your lack of knowledge of the sport, and doing enough events, you are again, misinformed. Indeed, if my horse has ran out of water, or feed, no matter what time it is, I can give them more. I have not met a judge yet, that would penalize you for doing so.(but one who will penalize you if your horse is found with an empty water bucket, and inattentive rider) But personally, I'd rather get my sleep at night, and KNOW when I went to bed, he had plenty of both, and that he can NOT knock over his buckets that are secure and safe in his camp area. Heck at the Cow Tanks Ride it not only rained, it POURED! I sleep in the front half of my stock trailer in a tent-cot - I simply pulled the divider gate shut and loaded her up in the back half and she spent the night with me in the trailer. Couldn't do that at a NATRC ride. Well, I could but I'd get a lower score or disqualified.<<< Again, misconception. If rain is expected, I have always asked the judges at the ride briefing, if they had any issue if I put my horse inside the trailer if the weather turned really nasty. And again, I have never had one have a problem with it. If I forgot to ask, I have still loaded them in the trailer, and mentioned it to the judge in the AM. They have not had issue with it. This is the kind of thing that get misconceptions of the organizations started, from riders who have not spent much time participating in the sport. And this applies to BOTH the NATRC and endurance communities. (and any other horse sport that someone has only done a little bit) Many who have never tried endurance are told by other CTR riders how the endurance riders run the crap out of their horses, are not friendly, are out there killing horses on the trail at every ride, etc. etc. You name the rumor, and it has been told. But those CTR riders have not actually dealt with endurance rides much, if any, to have formed these ideas. Yet, the rumors get going, and endurance can get a bad name, due to these rumors. Intersting fact regarding the Tevis finishers of 75% participating in NATRC prior to completing the Tevis. But, a large number of folks start out in NATRC before going to AERC. I'm sure dressage helps a lot as well -as any other event that requires good equitation <<< Actually, it is the education they get from learning to pace their horses, care for their horses, and having horses that are well mannered, and that you can "micro-manage" their footsteps if needed through tricky trail situations are what I think contributes to the CTR horses having a little better completion rate than those who have not done any CTR. It is the judging at the rides that indeed TEACHES folks how to do these things. This discussion started (as it usually does) with someone asking about starting a new horse in LD or CTR. There are pros and cons on both sides of this. Those how have done CTR with past horses, will almost always say CTR is the best for the new horse and riders. If the rider has never done CTR, then they will start a new horse in endurance or LD. But for the new rider, they have to decide which would work best for them. Also, what is available in their area. I started my newest in both CTR's, and multi-day type endurance rides. Going slow, not putting him in the situation to early in his ride career of having horses blast past him that are racing, has given me a horse who is very easy to control at the start of an endurance ride, and listens to ME as to what speed we will be going. This worked for ME, and my horse. I find no reason to "put down" either sport for the way they do things. I like them both. But, I have participated at both off and on for over 25 years. Jonni =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|