 |
[RC] Steve: 301 v Polar SW - Ridecamp GuestPlease Reply to: Laura T Tichenor06@xxxxxxxxx or ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ========================================== Please explain the exact technical differences between the software of the 301, and the Polar software. Where is the Polar better or worse than the 301? You can say one is "easier", but you show no data that will prove those statements. Where is it easier? Why? Do you and have you used the Polar product like April does with the 301, and with frequency in various situations? I have a 201, and love it. Garmin strives to make things easy for their end users. I can't see where Polar is easier. Not flaming you, just need the differences and evidence on the product. Maybe you could do a comparision of some sort if you use it in your riding like April does. Maybe you could compare the data she has out on the web, or something like that. Some "tools" may sound good, but when put to use in real situations, they aren't superior. jm life experience opinion. The Polar is way pricy compared to the Garmin 301. The 201 is ready to go when you open the box, slap it on your wrist, sync up with the sattelites, and hop on your horse. Which I let mine sync up while I saddle the horse, or if I am in a hurry I do it while I drive, so I can pop on the horse right away and get going. I really enjoy the 201. It gives good info on speed, time, distance. And endurance is all about distance! Laura T I do not own stock in garmin, and I am not working for them either. I use the 201 product - all the time when I am on horseback. (and not on horseback too) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|