 |
Re: [RC] Ridecamp awards - John TeeterI think the only way this can stay coherent may be some groundrules:a) when you post a nomination, clearly identify in the subject and body, the category for which you are providing a nomination. b) attach has URLs into the ridecamp archives, that (or thoses) messages which best exemplify the particular reason you are providing the nomination. For example: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp/archives/past/04/8/msg00128.html c) only post once for a given category. If there are discussions for the nominations, please make sure the subject line indicates that. d) everyone must be present and accounted for at the starting line. e) you can enter as many events (make nominations in as many categories) as you want (b/c we don't have a rule 14:) If things get out of hand -- don't forget the delete key!!:). The original post suggesting this mayhem, from Angee, is: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp/archives/past/04/9/msg00380.html johnt At 09:58 AM 2/28/2004, Jonni Jewell wrote: Gee, should we have nominations, or just give the awards??? For #11........>>>11. Most valuable free advice giver: For the expert who gives advice freely that one would have to pay for otherwise. ============================================================ The CRI was originally a test for humans developed at UCLA in 1939. A professor at UC Davis named Morey Fowler became interested in this and wondered how it would work on horses and started testing it. Dr. Fowler was at one time the head vet at Tevis. A young vet named Kerry Ridgeway worked with him on this project helping to collect the data...........and as they say, the rest is history... ~ mb ridecamp.net information: http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/ ============================================================
|