Re: [RC] AERC Drug rule - heidiOh come on - talk about a shell game. It doesn't matter if you call it "substance," "drug," or "chemical compound" rule 13 still has the same problem - lack of quantitative and qualitative clarity and specificity in the definition of what is and is not permissible. Oh, c'mon, Truman--you are a physicist. ZERO is a quantity. Ed and several others have gone over again and again WHY there are no additional "quatitative and qualitative" aspects to the rule, and their posts have been right on the mark--so there is likely no point in my repeating what they've articulated so well. I've yet to hear any concern with the "treatment" or "procedures" - all the concern and discussion comes about from the vaguness with respect to the "substances." By "treatments" and "procedures" are you referring to such things as bioscan, ionization, chiropractic manipulation, etc.? Rule 13 is clear about those, too, but apparently the reason the they have not been discussed here is because that isn't the part of the rule that has been questioned. Is this a further attempt to muddy the waters with respect to "substances?" Heidi =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|