![]() |
Re: [RC] [RC] [RC] RideCamp -LDs. - Lynne GlazerHere we go again.OK, come up with a new name for LD then. Intro. Or something. In Dressage there are levels. Come up with a new name. Riders who do, say, Prix St. George would not be comfortable having First Level riders grouped with them. So get creative, Howard. Just do NOT try and call it endurance. Like calling a 10K a marathon--it just doesn't WORK. And it's insulting. It is HARDER to do a 50 than to do a 25. They are not the same for either horse or rider. I can say that without IN ANY WAY putting down the lower distance. We have multi day rides. 100 mile rides. I don't consider a 50 equivalent to a 100--why would anyone? So why do you think a 50 is the same as a 25? We're all "distance riders", can't we just be comfortable with that? We will always have people/horses more comfortable with that introductory distance level--why try and categorize it the same when even the participants aren't looking for that? Lynne ride manager, endurance rider, LD rider whose endurance mare is past her due date, c'mon BABY On Apr 28, 2004, at 8:24 AM, Howard Bramhall wrote: Yes, but, one can dream. Dream of a day when the LD is no longer considered "limited." Dream of a day when all riders are educated to the point that the horse will always come first, no matter what the distance. Dream of a day when riders of all distances are treated equally. Dream of the day when knowledge of the past is used to aid us in our future. Dream of the day when we can come up with a solution to all of this.
ridecamp.net information: http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/ ============================================================
|