Re: [RC] Trail Judges needed??? - Lynne GlazerFWIW, recently on the second day of Bar H Boogie a rider finished first in front of the whole day's leader. When asked how many number checkers she'd seen in the park, she replied 2. There were 3, and simple perusal of the number checker sheets showed which one she'd missed. These 3 checkers were within a small park, and were there as much to keep the riders not lost as much as on the correct course. (Some riders came back a couple weeks later, did one of the loops from the ride just fine, and then were lost for hours in the park with a GPS!) Anyway, the rider who finished first got completion only, which she accepted with grace--it was not her intent to cheat and she'd done 99% of the course.Rides don't always have the staff to place enough number checkers out (plus if you're not a reader it is THE most boring job), and I liked the past suggestions of a punch or grease stick, but haven't tried them. Analyzing the course to determine where transgressors might try something is a pretty basic ride mgmt task--there was a cheater on the first Norco Riverdance ride, who actually cheated twice, caught once with a group of others and sent back out--but the evidence from other riders didn't come up for weeks afterwards about the second time. Analyzing number checker sheets post-ride is an awful task. And the hour or so of crunching results pre-awards is something I always dread, while enjoying most of the rest of hosting rides. :-P Lynne personal philosophy: Ride managment is akin giving birth, the only reason to be willing to do it again is because the memory of the pain fades over time...(skipping the latent masochistic tendency explanation) On Apr 23, 2004, at 10:15 AM, Barbara McCrary wrote:
============================================================ Prudence and focus will carry you a long way on a horse. ~ Frank Solano ridecamp.net information: http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/ ============================================================
|