Re: [RC] [RC] [AERC-Members] New LD BC Rule - Paul LatiolaisAt least the time versus weight should be different. If I come an hour behind someone on an LD, would it not make sense that I would come 2 hours behind that person on a 50, as a general rule? It seems that weight counts too much, especially on the LD. I am saying this as a heavyweight. I have heard more than one lightweight say, "I don't try for BC. I am too small."To (mis)-quote Howard, "Pass me another beer, please; I'm in training for the BC award." -paul On Saturday, April 3, 2004, at 02:11 PM, Howard Bramhall wrote: I do think the high vet score might be the way to go in the LDs. For endurance, I prefer to let the weight and time differences come into play. They should count for something (especially the weight since I'm so darn fat). For the LD, I'm not really sure. The horses are too darn fresh at the end of an LD and the winner might be, more often that not, the heaviest rider. The time difference won't be as great as it would in the 50 or 100, so, weight becomes more of a factor in the LD. ONe pound equals one half point. Pass me another beer, please, and no LITE stuff. I'm in training for the LD BC award.
ridecamp.net information: http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/ ============================================================
|