Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] MSM? - k s swigart

From the AERC website

"NON PERMISSIBLE SUBSTANCES
*A NON-INCLUSIVE LIST...

Please note that this list is NOT included in Rule 13 and is therefore
not a part of the AERC's rules.  What, in Rule 13, prevents the
administration of MSM?

If you are giving it because it is a good source of sulphur, it is
permissible.

If it has no pharmacological properties (as you assert), it is also
permissible.

It is only if you are wrong in your assertion that it has no
pharmacological properties that it would be in violation of Rule 13.

But it is only if you are wrong in your assertion that it has no
pharmacological properties that anybody would even WANT to give it to
their horse for any reason other than as a source of sulphur.

If a person believes it has pharmacological properties (whether it does
or not), and that is why they are giving it to their horse, their intent
is to violate Rule 13 (whether they are or not :)).

kat
Orange County, Calif.


============================================================
REAL endurance is taking your non-horsey family to a ridecamp with you!
~ Heidi Sowards

ridecamp.net information: http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/

============================================================

Replies
[RC] MSM?, k s swigart
Re: [RC] MSM?, Truman Prevatt