Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

RE: [RC] They all only go on "with qualifications" - Bob Morris

I beg to differ with you Kat but as per our By-laws there
are two types of rides detailed for endurance but, not as
you describe them. <<<Unlike Maryben, I don't think it is
such a bad idea to recognize that there are two competitions
going on at an endurance ride.  There is the ride, and there
is the race.>>>>

The only two are those describes in the By-laws section
4.01. A "Ride" shall consist of one of the following events
in which the equine shall be under the control of
veterinarians experienced with equines or endurance riding.
All riders who successfully complete the Ride must receive a
completion award. There shall be no minimum time limit for
completion.

(a) "Endurance Ride." An Endurance Ride is defined as an
athletic event in which the same equine and rider cover a
specified course of not less than 50 miles within a maximum
time limit proportional to 12 hours per 50 miles and
conforms to the Rules in effect at the time of the Ride. The
Endurance Ride must be open to all breeds of equines at
least 60 months of age as determined under the AERC Rules.
The winner of the Ride is the equine and rider who
successfully complete the course in the fastest time. An
award for the equine judged to be in best condition must be
available, though may not be awarded if no equine meets
minimum criteria.

(b) "Limited Distance Ride." A Limited Distance Ride" is
defined as an event in which the same equine and rider cover
a specified course of between 25 and 35 miles within a
maximum time limit proportional to 6 hours per 25 miles and
conforms to the Rules in effect at the time of the Ride. The
Limited Distance Ride must be held in conjunction with an
Endurance Ride and must be open to all breeds of equines at
least 48 months of age as determined under the AERC Rules.


Bob

Bob Morris
Morris Endurance Enterprises
Boise, ID

-----Original Message-----
From: ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of k s
swigart
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 10:28 PM
To: Heidi Smith
Cc: Ride Camp
Subject: [RC] They all only go on "with qualifications"


Heidi Smith wrote in speaking of the horse that died of
Exhausted horse syndrome after being given a "provisional"
pass at the vet check:

Well, that would be an interesting notion--if not for the
facts that 1) it
was cool out, 2) there was water on the trail, 3) she
didn't trot--she
galloped, and used a whip to get the horse to gallop,

And Merryben writes about allowing horses that continue with
qualifications for "completion only":

I hate this one.  If the horse cannot go on without
qualifications, it does not
need to go on.  The horse has no ego and does not care
about completion, or
winning or anything else........mb

In reading these two different posts, I am struck by the
fact that all vet check "passes" are with the
"qualification" of "as long as you don't ride your horse
beyond its capabilities."  Vets are not there to disqualify
any horse that couldn't gallop the rest of the course if
that it what its idiot rider chose to do with the horse
after it was around the first bend out of sight.

If this were the case, vets should just disqualify all the
horses at the start because the rider MIGHT ride the horse
beyond its capabilities.

If the vet believes that a thinking rider can get the horse
through the ride by riding it within its capabilities (even
if the extent of its capabilities at that particular time is
only to walk), then that horse is, by definition, "fit to
continue" and should theoretically be allowed to go on.

However, there are plenty of vets that evaluate the fitness
(and here I am talking about mental fitness as much as
physical fitness) of riders at the same time that they
evaluate the fitness of horses even though there isn't
anything in the rules that technicallly allows a vet to do
this.  So what happens now (despite the fact that
technically it is against the rules) is that horses that are
marginally compromised are allowed to continue if the vet
thinks the rider understands the situation and will ride
accordingly, but they are pulled if the vet thinks the rider
is an idiot.

Unlike Maryben, I don't think it is such a bad idea to
recognize that there are two competitions going on at an
endurance ride.  There is the ride, and there is the race.
And that it is entirely possible for a horse to be "fit to
continue" in the ride without being "fit to continue" in the
race.  Since vets are allowed to disqualify horses based on
their evaluation of the horse's fitness, I see no reasons
that vets should not be allowed to disqualify horses from
the race without disqualifying them from the ride.

I know of one vet who does this (or at least claims to do
this:)) by giving riders "provisional" permission to
continue in the ride just so long as they disqualify
themselves from the race.  And tells the rider that if s/he
then, chooses to race in anyway that he (the vet) will "get
a lot better at seeing lameness" at the finish line. :)

Since some vets have already figured out a back door way to
disqualify horses from the race without disqualifying it
from the ride, it doesn't seem such a bad idea to me to
change the rules so they can do it through the front door
instead.

I'd like to see a show of hands from ride vets themselves.
How many of them would like to be able to disqualify a horse
as being unfit to continue in the race without having to
disqualify the horse as being unfit to continue in the ride?

Personally, I think that there are lots of horses that fall
into that category by about 2/3 rds of the way through the
ride.  The way the RULES are right now, vets can ONLY
disqualify horses that are unfit to continue the ride and
hope that the rider has enough sense not to race that horse
the rest of the way.

There is no horse that is even fit to START, if the criteria
for starting includes, "no matter how stupidly the rider
rides the horse."

kat
Orange County, Calif.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net,
http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer:
http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe
http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-=-=



=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Replies
[RC] They all only go on "with qualifications", k s swigart