Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

RE: [RC] IronMan GPS - Robin White

Hi,

 

Don’t know if anyone addressed this issue, so, I’m sorry if I missed it:  How does the Iron Man GPS deal with really shady, densely covered rides.  I found that my Garmin “Vista” unit did very poorly; it only registered 30 of the 50 mile ride [yes, fresh batteries], and it’s clear that I had no signal when we were in the trees.  I heard the Iron Man tracks more satellites, and this is why it may do better…

 

I’d love some feedback / experiences!!

 

Thanks

 

Robin

 

Robin White

[818] 757.3031 . Phone

[818] 757.3280 . Fax

uberone@xxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of RunRoskoRun@xxxxxxx
Sent:
Monday, December 15, 2003 9:10 AM
To: Sundaez@xxxxxxx; kskf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RC] IronMan GPS

 

In a message dated 12/15/2003 8:37:32 AM Pacific Standard Time, Sundaez@xxxxxxx writes:


The Iron Man eats batteries IMO. I have to replace them every couple rides. It uses the 3  AA batteries. I had 6 hours on the last batteries I used before it flaked out near the end of a training ride. ANyone else have this problem? Does keeping in "monitor" mode eat more battery power than if you keep it on the Odometer?
 
Mel



I invested in a set of rechargeable batteries and it has been well worth the initial expense.  They seem to last longer on one charge than standard batteries as well.

abigail


Replies
Re: [RC] IronMan GPS, RunRoskoRun