Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] What is Real Endurance!! - Joe Long

On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:06:41 -0700 (Mountain Standard Time), "Joane
Pappas White" <Lyoness@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

My hope is that I can reach enough of the Newbies to make changes for the
better before the organization is irreparably damaged or we have to remove
the divisive elements---one way or the other.   Although I am totally
prepared for the biggest "Flaming" in the history of Ridecamp, I would
request that you think about this prediction:  What I am saying in this post
will be the status quo within 10-15 years, whether we competitive Baby
Boomers tear each other apart or not.  The younger generation has a sense of
civility and inclusion that we often lack, and they will make these changes
because theyse changes are right and fair and need to be done for the sport.

Two of the great strengths that have been a cornerstone of endurance
are civility and inclusion.  No one in this discussion is trying to
exclude anyone, and most of us have been civil.

However, this issue has been going on and been debated for more than
20 years now; I do not agree that in 10-15 years we will see the
distance for endurance rides lowered to 25 miles per day.  I certainly
hope not.

When I started Non-endurance riding---as I only do LD and therefore am not a
REAL endurance rider-----about 7 years ago,  AERC was in serious financial
trouble.  Had it not been for the dedicated efforts of that BoD and sponsors
like Sundowner (whose discount program brought in many new members and still
does and many of those ride LD), the predictions then were that AERC would
not still be here in 2004.  The fact that the organization is here at all is
the result of policies of inclusion, not exclusion.

True.

Anyway you want to look at it , the term "Oldtimer" is no longer one of
respect but rather one that is fast becoming synonymous with being an
anachronism.  Having ridden endurance for a long time, does not make you an
Oldtimer.  Being an Oldtimer means you have not seen the handwriting on the
wall and you continue to cling to attitudes which are counterproductive to
the best interests of this organization.  When you insist on labels that are
archaic and divisive and are intended to demean your own members, you are an
Oldtimer---a Dinosaur!  We all know what happened to the dinosaurs when they
could not adapt.  

A tactic often used against people who oppose some *particular* change
as a change in the wrong direction, is to accuse them of being opposed
to change itself.  Unfortunately, calling people "dinosaurs" is
neither civil nor inclusive, and does not contribute to the debate.

BTW, the term "Limited Distance" is an honorable one and not intended
to demean anybody.  As is the term "Endurance Ride," which is not an
archaic or divisive label.

I crew for 100 milers in international competition.  I would point out that
anyone who has actually helped keep a 100 miler and the 100 mile horse in
the race, would laugh at those of you who think that you are real endurance
riders at 50 miles.  Interestingly enough, I find most of the serious 100
milers are gracious and humble and do not need to boost their own importance
by pointed out that their division is "100" miles!  Perhaps they realize
that there are so few of them in 100 miles for the long run, that they
remember the old saying, "Remember the faces of the people you step on as
you go up the mountain, because those are the same faces you will see as you
are coming back down".

Well, 100's are my favorite kind of ride, and I've done may of them.
Although I've been unable to do one for some time now.

You don't have to be a 100-mile rider or a multi-day rider to be an
endurance rider, but if you want to experience the finest challenges
our sport has to offer, you need to do both of those.

I found it delightful to meet some of the best 50 mile riders in the country
this year in LD---not because they were "playing nonendurance riders" for
the day but because they were saying things like----"I just don't want to
ride 50 miles any more! or I love riding with my family in LD and teaching
them!"  There are many such Oldtimers, who have been doing 50's forever,
coming into LD ---On please do tell Julie Suhr that she and Bob are not REAL
Endurance riders!!  That will end your credibility permanently.

Where do you get the idea that riding an LD somehow turns an endurance
rider into no longer an endurance rider?  Nobody here ever said that.
I ride LD's too, you know.

And, hey, are you calling Julie Suhr a "Dinosaur" who "continue[s] to
cling to attitudes which are counterproductive to the best interests
of this organization?"  Sorry, I don't think so!!!    ; ^ >

I could point out that many of you are kidding yourselves about riding "REAL
Endurance" right now!  Why are the rides that are flat, easy and not really
50 miles long ( but give you credit for 50 miles) growing in number while
the REAL Endurance rides like Outlaw Trail are decreasing?  The answer is:
Oldtimers want to tell themselves that they are still Real Endurance riders.
After all, they are the ones who have made LD the bastard child of the
sport so now they cannot admit that they are only riding LD.  God forbid
that they would not get to count such paltry efforts into their lifetime
mileage records!  BUT THAT IS JUST WHAT YOU ARE DOING AT MANY OF THESE SO
CALLED 50 MILE RIDES---YOU ARE RIDING LD!  And what is worse, is that you
KNOW it, and take credit for the mileage.

Several of us have recently discussed the point regarding the
difficulty of some 50-mile rides.  I'd personally rather see the
definition longer, but do you really think there's any chance the AERC
will redefine endurance rides as 75 miles in one day and up?

Then there is the issue:  What is Enduring?  Endurance was not just a
distance, it was also a trail!  Have you heard of the number of ride
managers who have cut out a difficult part of the 50 mile course because 50
milers were "whining" about it and would not come back if that part of the
course was in the ride.  Those of us who live in REAL mountains would point
out that the flatlanders are not riding endurance on all those flat gravel
roads.  REAL endurance is treacherous, rocky, 1000's of feet of elevation
changes---Tevis/Cougar Rock in its original state!---not these strolls
through the park with courses that are mowed for you!  

Hmmm, that doesn't sound very inclusive to me.

By all means, let's see how many more "labels" we can make that are not REAL
endurance!  Let see----If you cannot do a multiday on the same horse, you
are not a REAL endurance rider!  If you have a crew, you are not a REAL
endurance rider!  Now, while you "REAL" endurance riders are all giving
yourselves vanity pats on the back for being real endurance riders, may I
remind you that "A House Divided Against Itself WILL Fall!

Except that all of those rides are endurance rides, by AERC
definition.  The only "division" here is coming from a few who want to
change LD rides to endurance rides.

Or must we eliminate weight divisions, Junior division, etc, so that
our house won't fall?

Endurance riding started on the wave of the Baby Boom and it will go down
with it if this continues.  It should be apparent to even the most casual
observer, that the majority of people in this sport will eventually vote to
abolish the REAL/NONREAL distinction at some point and we will all become
endurance riders for the benefit of the sport.  At that time, there will be
divisions that will embrace everyone in a "win-win" situation because no one
needs to perpetuate the "I am better than you" mentality that has created
the distinctions in the first place.  You will earn lifetime endurance miles
credited to each division, and there will be enough recognition for a job
well done to keep everyone in this sport and many more knocking on the door.
It is only a matter of time and leadership and how many "Oldtimers" have to
be removed first.

I hope you are mistaken.  Having a sport with challenging goals,
people who work hard to achieve those goals, and recognition of those
achievements is a worthwhile thing that I hope we never lose.

Hmmmm ... how does "removing Oldtimers" jibe with civility and
inclusion?

(an oldtimer and proud of it)

-- 

Joe Long
jlong@xxxxxxxx
http://www.rnbw.com


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Replies
[RC] What is Real Endurance!!, Joane Pappas White