Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] What is the point? - Truman Prevatt



John & Sue Greenall wrote:

Deaths of horses could radically change our sport if PETA gets a hold of us. Look at what happened in eventing!
While people rest easy thinking this could not happen to endurance - I am sure the eventing people were thinking the same thing. I will only take one person outside to get "incensed" enough to start to investigate and then start the legal and public relations pressure. With dead horses at just the WEC and Pan Am would be sufficient - much less when they start digging further and find the other 5 or 6 this year and the 5 or 6 last year. Once these folks get their claws in you they don't let go - just ask the eventers.  What was it I read about an LA Times writer at the NC asking a lot of questions on risk?
People who are outside of my sport ask me about it...when horses die at the Worlds and Pan Ams, the rest of the world wonders just what we are doing out there? As much as I would like to place the responsibility of the horse totally on the rider...it simply is not realistic. The sport has to protect itself, and the horse, by using whatever safeguards it has available. If you look at AERC history, you can see the evolution of this concept by way of lower pulses , stricter completion criteria, better educated vets and treatment availability. I am now advocating putting in gate and gos or more holds to protect the horse. Granted, this may change how we play and may be an "inconvenience" at some rides, but I am willing to accept it if it saves me from witnessing another horse death. I would hope that most of my fellow riders would agree.

This one does.

Truman


Replies
[RC] What is the point?, John & Sue Greenall