Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] It's not the distance... - Joe Long

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 10:35:37 -0600, "E.L. Ashbach"
<samaia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Here we have the crux of the problem ... you seem to feel that you
know what is optimum for someone else's horse better than they.

Joe, please read my posts.  I don't proclaim to know, but I'd bet the 
Vet Committee, or the head vet, or ride manager, at each ride feels like 
they could give a reasonable guideline for the new horse and rider.  

OK, not "You" personally ... but someone.

Now, a guideline would be OK ... as long as it is a recommendation,
not a rule.

Yep, CTR does, and we do ourselves honor as endurance riders to provide 
safety measures for those beginners who don't know what optimal is, and 
for any equine lucky enough to be brought to this life by someone who 
loves them.

IMO we do not need Yet Another Rule that takes responsibility away
from the rider and tells them how they must pace their horse.  No, we
do not do ourselves honor by doing so ... we change our sport in a
fundamental way, away from endurance and toward CTR.  Now, CTR is a
fine sport for those who like it, but so is endurance, thank you.

Wow, not another rule?  Is this Joe "minimum rider age rule" Long? ;-)  

Yep, though I don't want to stir that debate up again -- we have
always had a minimum age for the horses, and I do believe we should
show equal concern and responsibility for our juvenile human
participants as we do for our juvenile equine participants.

BTW, Kahlil and I began our careers with one 25-mile ride before going
on to our first 50.  I have never done more than two 25's on any horse
I've started in endurance before moving to 50's.  The speed I ride
them depends on the horse, usually mid-pack although in one case in
last place, and in another first-to-finish.  I do not want you or
anyone else to tell me how fast to bring them along.

Nobody would telling you how to ride any distance, once you demonstrate 
that what you *think* your new horse can do, it really can do.  Like I 
told Heidi, if you've got to ride your new horse in a 4 hour 50 because 
it'll ruin that horse to go slower, take a 1 1/2 hour vet check or 
something.  It's ludicrous to be holding up "optimal ride pacing" like 
it's *the most important thing in any endurance ride* for a discussion 
of new horses and riders.  Smell the roses the first time or two, you'll 
have years to race, as you well know.

And just how would one "demonstrate" that?  Especially on speed-limit
rides?

My own feeling is that as long as you prepare properly and pace the
25's properly, one or two is enough before moving to the 50's.  The
real key is properly pacing the 50's, and again that pace depends on
many factors and cannot be set by a rule.

I do agree that many if not most *beginning* riders would benefit, and
their horses would benefit, if they spent some time doing 25's and
learning the ropes before attempting 50's.  But that is (and should
be) an individual decision.


Let me be clear:  this is a ROOKIE RULE.   It's for NEW HORSES and 
RIDERS.  There's nothing magic about new riders or horses doing any 
particular distance, it's the speed they ride their chosen distance.

Sorry, but I'm not willing to waive the flag of personal freedom and 
responsibility with a mob who haven't demonstrated their ability to 
handle it.  

And I'm not willing to impose unnecessary and counterproductive rules
on people just because they're newcomers to the sport.

Not everyone starts with 25's.  What would you do, require new riders
(or horses) to do X number of (speed-restricted) 25's before being
allowed to enter a 50?  Would you restrict their speed in 50's until
they somehow "demonstrate" that they can be allowed to do more?

One of the wonderful things about endurance is that it is a sport that
has NOT been ruined by "control freaks" who want to force everyone to
ride in some "approved" fashion.  We provide vet controls that demand
that a horse be fit to continue, but we wisely do not try to dictate
how the rider achieves that standard.

-- 

Joe Long
jlong@xxxxxxxx
http://www.rnbw.com


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Replies
[RC] It's not the distance..., E.L. Ashbach
Re: [RC] It's not the distance..., Heidi Smith
Re: [RC] It's not the distance..., E.L. Ashbach
Re: [RC] It's not the distance..., Heidi Smith
Re: [RC] It's not the distance..., E.L. Ashbach
Re: [RC] It's not the distance..., Heidi Smith
Re: [RC] It's not the distance..., Heidi Smith
Re: [RC] It's not the distance..., E.L. Ashbach
Re: [RC] It's not the distance..., Joe Long
Re: [RC] It's not the distance..., E.L. Ashbach