Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

[RC] Protecting Our Horses, Protecting Our Sport - rides2far

  -The horses deaths this year may exceed the number last 
  year -- and last year was regarded as an anomolous high    year

I have a problem with our grouping all horse deaths together. To me, a
horse falling off a cliff does not really contribute to the type of
research we're concentrating on unless we want to get more active in
making trails safe. Also, a horse rupturing an aorta or something like
that (didn't that happen to Teddy Bear in the ROC?) that was simply a
lifelong time bomb waiting to happen don't contribute. It's like when the
guy who started the running craze in the 70's died while jogging. You had
people jokingly saying jogging killed him when in truth, it had kept him
alive longer than he should have lived with his heart condition, even if
that was shorter than the average life span. When you're dealing with
numbers as low as 7 or 8 adding or taking away one number can make a big
% difference.

  -Over 15% of the horses at the recent Pan Ams had to be    treated
with IVs and one horse died (this is consistent    with performances at
other similar competitions in past 
  year and in my opinion is unacceptable).

As I recall the management in Vermont was critisized for having very
short loops and many vet checks. The FEI even condemned it, but I thought
the completion rate went up and treatments down. Am I mistaken? How long
were the loops at the 2003 PAC? Any noticable difference in results?

  -According to a recent post on ride camp, 6 out of the 
top    10 life-time mileage riders in our sport have lost  horses    to
ride-related deaths. 

Again, I think it's irresponsible to group them all together. If you ride
horseback 25,000 miles, you've spent a lot of time on horseback. Your
odds go up dramatically. I was on a trail ride with a horse who stuck his
foot through the reins, flipped over backwards and slammed its head on
the ground dying instantly. Stuff like that happens around horses and if
you spend enough time on them it'll probably happen to you. I recall the
in depth description from Julie Suhr about her horse's death. In my
opinion that death should have no stigma whatsoever for her. On the other
hand, there were other cases where everyone had the urge to say "told you
so" when it happened. There's a *big* difference in the two scenarios.

A few things I'd like to see done when crunching numbers. I'd like to
see, rather than "7 deaths in 2002 compared to 5 in 1998 (or whatever it
was" I'd like to see "deaths per hundred miles of competition" or
something like that. We need to factor in the number of horses competing
and the number of miles completed. 7 deaths out of 700 miles ridden is a
bit different than 7 deaths out of 700,000 miles ridden.

I think endurance riding has made huge strides just since I started in
1987. Horses used to be skinny, lathered, pretty darned rough looking. I
look around huge rides now and see beautifully conditioned horses in well
fitting tack ridden by sober people who have made honest attempts to do
things right. I don't know who it is that thinks "racing" is new, but
they should have been around when the pulse criteria was 72 and if your
horse made 72 within the 30 minute straight hold you left 30 min. from
your arrival time, with the horse who had recoverd in 2 min. , even if
he'd only recovered in the last 3 minutes. There were no ride cards. The
vets at the next check didn't have any idea how he'd looked at the last
check. Many vets had never been to an endurance ride or had any info from
AERC on what to expect or look for. There was no such thing as a CRI. Can
you imagine going back to this?

I have tried going on group trail rides lately to get in some slow miles
and I can't do it. The conditions the horses are dealing with are
HORRIBLE! There are so many people who have no clue what they're doing.
So many horses being abused whether intentionally or out of ignorance. I
have to ride at endurance rides because it's the only place I can enjoy
riding any more. 

I wonder how many horses' lives have been SAVED by endurance...for
instance "Red" who was headed out for dogfood and if he hadn't made an
endurance horse would have been in a can? My horse certainly wouldn't
have earned any ribbons for standing quietly in a ring and giving them a
slow collected trot. I  think endurance has saved many an endurance
minded horse from a life of abuse at the hands of those who wanted
something a bit more lethargic. I think endurance is a godsend and our
problems, though sometimes serious are confined to a minority of the
riders.

All this doesn't mean I'm not *for* trying to make things safer. But I
don't believe in beating ourselves up when we're really trying to do
better.  Some of the finest horsemen I know  competed in the Pan Ams and
like Steph brought their healthy horses back home with them to beat us
with next year. They learn things about the effect of competition and
hauling and they pass the knowledge down to us to use. I appreciate that.
Congratulations to all of you who did a good job. 

Angie

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=