<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] RO, Fit to continue
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:39:27 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: [RC] Bloodline Query
  • - Snodgrass, Bonnie
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] RO, Fit to continue
  • - LOUISE BURTON

    Re: [RC] RO, Fit to continue - Truman Prevatt


    On the other hand if someone is sitting back East looking for a vacation route out west to do rides, the pull codes - accurately recorded - would give a person some idea of the ride. If there were a lot of lameness pulls he could investigate and find out why - maybe it's rocky and he would have to make sure he had pads before he showed up. Or it might be very sandy and if his horse had not been trained in sand, he might want to avoid it. The list goes on.

    I think this pull code argument thing is pretty much a red herring. In every sport statistics on individuals are kept and made public. Batting averages from little league on up through the majors appear in print in some form or the other. Box scores appear in print. Results, times and statistics of track meets appear in print. The current process of listing of all the riders in an event in order of finish, time and disposition of those that didn't finish is nothing more than goes on in any sport.

    If someone has a problem feeling that they somehow have a negative connotation, I would suspect that it is only to a handful of people - and even if there is such a connotation, over time it will disappear. The value of the codes far outweigh any reason I have heard not to use them.

    Truman

    Barbara McCrary wrote:

    Interesting post, John.  Considering the opinions from other ridecampers, I
    would think recording only DNF for results in Endurance News would be
    adequate, but submitting pull and treatment records to the vet committee for
    research would be important.  This way, the information is in the hands of
    those who wanted it in the first place, and the public record is
    non-specific as to reason.  Would this please everyone (if such a thing is
    possible)?  I also think the responsibility should go back to the ride
    manager and the head vet for submitting pull and treated horse records to
    the office.  I'm not convinced that all riders would be willing to submit
    them.

    Barbara McCrary







    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
    Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

    If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the Director at Large and By Laws Elections.

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


    Replies
    RE: [RC] RO, Fit to continue, John A. Teeter
    Re: [RC] RO, Fit to continue, Barbara McCrary