>>says Bob: Now, you tell me why the membership cannot 
  conform with such a simple thing.  >>
   
  I think there are two 
  basic reasons.
   
  1. The human nature 
  factor - For most riders, having your horse pulled from a ride because of 
  lameness or metabolic issues is fairly traumatic. We feel bad for our 
  horse, it's a big disappointment, maybe even embarassment, and it represents 
  some sort of failure. And knowing that your peers will see in the 
  ride results that your horse was pulled and listed as L, or M, is not 
  a cheerful thought.  There are many circumstances where riders will 
  take a marginal horse through a ride in order to get completion, rather 
  than be pulled - even though it may be in the best interest of the horse 
  to call it a day... Completion rate is something people brag 
  about, yet?  Being pulled is something to avoid. Bob can poo 
  poo this all he wants (and I suspect he will :) but it really is a factor. 
  
   
  If allowing riders an 
  option for a gracefull exit is in the best interest of the horse (the bottom 
  line) then we should do so. 
   
  2.  L or M simply does not always apply -  For 
  statistical purposes it would be much more meaningful if L always meant the 
  same thing "the horse was eliminated due 
  to a grade III lameness".   Or M always meant 'the horse 
  was eliminated do to metabolic dysfunction'. If we include anything 
  less than the this, and include times when the rider thought the 
  horse 'didn't feel right' or even include times when the rider thought 'if I 
  continue, my horse really will be lame' then we are diluting the statistics 
  and they become less meaningful.  
   
  Steph