Re: [RC]   Horse/Rider History Books re: PULL CODES - heidi
 
>it seemed to me that this sort of code
> was indicating that the rider was wise enough to pull his own horse, but
> the vets would be still be able to glean some sort of information about
> what was happening to the horse. Can anyone explain to me why  RO-L and
> RO-M are not satisfactory to some of the membership?
Barbara, while the data still has to be looked at as L or M, because the
"RO" part has no bearing on severity, I have no problem with this if it
massages some peoples' egos and makes them less resistant to having the
proper pull code reported.
Heidi
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
 Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
 If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the Director at Large 
 and By Laws Elections.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
 
- Replies
- 
  - RE: [RC]   Horse/Rider History Books re: PULL CODES, Bob Morris
 
- Re: [RC]   Horse/Rider History Books re: PULL CODES, Charles
 
- Re: [RC]   Horse/Rider History Books re: PULL CODES, Barbara McCrary
 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 |