Re: [RC]   hackamores, et al - Zephyr Arabians
 
--- Laurie Durgin <ladurgin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I read a book on bits and bridles that stated alot
> of people think a hacamore is gentler and more
> humane than a bit, but actually is could have severe
> leverage, depending on the shanks, noseband ,etc.
> It's just that it is on the nose and not the mouth.
Yes.  A mechanical hackamore can be one of the most
severe bits you can use.  And, yes, even though it's
not in the mouth, it's still a bit.
But, like all bits & all training equipment, it's not
necessarily the equipment that's harsh or "cruel" but
the person whose hands are using it...
> bout the spanish jacima(sp?) and bosal, and said the
> horse had to be trained to tuck before you could use
> one on him. 
Again, yes.  This also applies to bitless bridles,
sidepulls, riding in a halter, etc.  These work best
on a horse who holds it's head closer to the vertical.
 If a horse carries it's nose up in the air, these are
not the best options (in fact, I think I even saw a
bitless bridle website that was honest enough to
mention this). ;)
~Nicole
=====
*      Zephyr Arabians & KattWmn Web Design      *
*         http://www.zephyrarabians.com          *  
*             http://www.kattwmn.com             *  
* From the "Horse Capitol of the USA" Norco, CA  *
*                                                *
* You have the right to remain silent, anything  * 
* you say can be misquoted and used against you. *
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
 Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
 If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the upcoming By-Laws 
 Election!!!! (it takes 2/3rds to tango!!)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
 
- Replies
- 
  - Re: [RC]   hackamores, et al, Laurie Durgin
 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 |