<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] [RC] [RC] protecting horses
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:28:18 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] Refusing entry to rides [was How Sad]
  • - Kristene Smuts
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] Red Cell
  • - Heidi Smith

    Re: [RC] [RC] [RC] protecting horses - Nancy Mitts


    Thanks Linda,
    I know that's been the take on the rule up here too. Is Central Region the only one looking at it that way?


    Nancy

    From: "Linda Parrish" <lindap@xxxxxxx>
    To: "Ridecamp" <ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Subject: Re: [RC]   [RC] protecting horses
    Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 22:38:00 -0500

    Nancy,

    There was a situation at a ride three or four years back where a ride
    manager held a check without a vet present. It was just a stop-n-go (meet
    pulse criteria and continue on). Vonita (and TERA) agreed that this was in
    violation of the AERC rules. The TERA rides always have a vet on hand at any
    control point on the rides.


    Linda Parrish
    Kennard, TX



    _________________________________________________________________
    Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=