<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: [RC] Pre-Ride VC Issues and a few others
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:27:25 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: [RC] More Thoughts- and those going away
  • - Roger Rittenhouse
  • Prev by Date: [RC] I'm outta here
  • - JUDYK89

    [RC] Pre-Ride VC Issues and a few others - Randy H Eiland


    Roger,
    
    I definitely agree with your comments on AERC Rule 13 as it DOES NOT
    relate to blood test/analysis at AERC rides.  I definitely do not think
    it is a rules violation for a rider to see the results of a blood
    test/analysis during the ride. In fact, I think it actually satisfies and
    falls under AERC Bylaw VI, Sections 1, 2, & 3...all dealing with the
    collection of scientific data, rider education, prevention of cruelty to
    animals, etc.  I don't believe knowledge and the subsequent use of that
    knowledge is unfair nor is it a violation of our rules.
    
    As to some of your other thoughts, I will comment after those I don't
    particularly agree with - Randy Eiland
    
    
    From: Roger Rittenhouse <roger@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    Subject: Re[2]: [RC]   Pre-Ride VC Issues and a few others
     
     
     
    RR- If this hazing at a trot out was not important to present the horse -
    all horses in the same condition,   then why did FEI
    adopt the no hazing chasing rule?
    
    RE- FEI also tried to adopt a policy that the "race ends" after the first
    20% of the entered equines completed, FEI also approved the UAE/|FEI
    Masters Series (also known by the acronym, SCAM)...need I go on?
     
    RR - In the long run we really do not need more rules only compliance
    with
    the ones we have.
    
    RE- I agree, but I can tell you that, as Rules Committee Chair, even that
    committee is having a hard time agreeing unanimously on what our rules
    say or mean.  Many AERC Rules are ambiguous, interpreted differently
    depending upon the circumstances or who is interpreting them. 
     
    RR- What I see more of is the misuse and abuse of authority from the
    vets. We have to comply to the letter and the intent of the rules, but
    the vets are given all the leeway they desire and have the final
    say in all cases.
    If the issue was for the protection of the horse - I have no problem,
    but redefining the criteria  beyond that scope of the rules is
    inappropriate.
    
    RE- I kind of agree with you but maybe not with as much conviction?
     
    RR- I have tried to find the rule that says a vet may pull a horse for
    any
    reason they so desire, cant find that. There are comments in the Vet
    procedure manual that may be construed to indicate they have that
    authority. But I cannot find a clear statement.
    
    RE- That rule does not exist, but Rule 2.1.5 states the Vet's decision
    regarding disqualification are final...but that must be related to Rule
    2.1.4 that states that the equine is examined for metabolic and
    mechanical parameters....so the DQ by a Vet can only be related to those
    parameters and violation of Rule 3.3 that refers to an equine that
    constitutes a clear danger to other equines or humans....The real answer
    to your premise that some Vets are overstepping the boundaries of a
    smooth ride lies with competent, educated Ride Managers.  When it is all
    said and done, an AERC endurance ride is like a small franchise business
    with AERC being the Franchisor...and the Ride Manager is the Franchisee. 
    The Vet is not a partner in the business, but is a paid employee of the
    Ride Manager.  That does no imply that the RM can in any way over rule a
    valid veterinary observation and decision...but it does imply that the RM
    and Vets must have an understanding of what is expected, how it will be
    handled, and they must be able to work together in a smooth and
    cooperative relationship.  If that is accomplished, then the ride will
    operate successfully - following AERC Rules and common sense...that does
    not mean everyone will always be satisfied, but it should mean there will
    be no valid complaints related to management and veterinary issues.
    
     
    RR- Who gave them all power to do what ever they please.? The personal
    beliefs of many vets are implied and become part of how they vet.
    Example would be those vets who do not like racing applying their
    personal philosophical   attitude and censuring a rider with a lecture or
    a pull.
    
    RE - See my preceding statement above.
     
    
     
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=