Re: Re: Weak Loin

["Barbara McCrary" <bigcreekranch@cruzio.com>]

I think I own a classic example of a horse with a long weak back.  I've had
him for 12 years, and he's a dear in many ways, but he didn't prove to be an
outstanding endurance horse; in part because of the long weak back, and in
part because he hyper-extends and has damaged his front suspensories a
couple of times.  I'm now working with a five year old who has a
tremendously strong back, who doesn't hyper-extend, but I'll bet he's going
to be a good 'un!  So far, my experience with long or weak-backed horses
shows that by the time they reach their teens, they become sway-backed, as
well.

Barbara





----- Original Message -----
From: <CMKSAGEHIL@aol.com>
To: <lbm@naisp.net>; <harpy@io.com>
Cc: <ridecamp@endurance.net>
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 8:22 PM
Subject: RC: Re: Weak Loin


> In a message dated Fri, 14 Sep 2001  5:16:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
"Linda B. Merims" <lbm@naisp.net> writes:
>
> > The Pan Am Championship was
> > the first time I had a chance examine leading endurance horses
> > close up--especially during the Best Condition judging--and try
> > to assess their conformation to try to find any common thread
> > (bone, neck, chest, legs, feet, whatever...)
> >
> > The one fact about their conformation that really stood out?
> > All of the horses standing for BC had uniformly *outstanding*
> > strong backs.  No dippyness behind the withers.  No dippy loins
> > (the curse of the Morgan breed).  Just these razor-straight,
> > level backs that blended perfectly into their rumps.
>
> This is something that really started to impress me several years ago as a
ride vet, too.  Over the years I'd been taught the old standard of
evaluating a horse from the ground up--legs, legs, legs!  But as I examined
more and more successes and failures, the most common denominator I found
among the failures was POOR backs.  Time and time again, I've seen horses
with excellent legs go lame because of compensating for back problems.  When
their backs won't carry weight efficiently, they compensate--they get more
concussion all around, and A LOT more strain on the hind legs, trying to use
them to make up for the lack of rounding in the back.  Not to mention just
plain sore backs--something I've seen rise to an alarming level among
endurance horses, since most entry level horses in this sport are the
"cast-offs" from modern show breeding programs, where bad backs abound.
>
> I've completely revamped how I evaluate riding horses now--I START with
the backs and the balance of the body, and if I don't like what I see, I
don't even bother to look at the legs...
>
> Heidi
>
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
> Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>