|
    Check it Out!    
|
|
RideCamp@endurance.net
RC: Re: Uphill and Down.. in simple terms
- To: wsabg@t-online.de, ridecamp@endurance.net
- Subject: RC: Re: Uphill and Down.. in simple terms
- From: CMKSAGEHIL@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:19:50 EST
- Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 08:20:56 -0800 (PST)
- Resent-From: ridecamp@endurance.net
- Resent-Message-ID: <Diw2DC.A.ZrQ.oLJh4@whale.fsr.net>
- Resent-Sender: ridecamp-request@endurance.net
In a message dated 1/18/00 3:39:29 AM Pacific Standard Time,
wsabg@t-online.de writes:
<< sorry, but if a horse going downhill and after that the horse is sore in
the hindleg, isn't that way of going downhill the right one? Or
shouldn't this horse better use more "braking-power" from his frontlegs?
If there is no damage in the front, but in the back, why not
distributing the force more equal?
Or am I completely on the wrong run here? >>
The difference, Wolfgang, is that the horses that are "sore" in the rear
simply have tired muscles from overdoing if they do too much and too fast,
whereas the horses that are "sore" from braking with the front legs are more
apt to have tendon or ligament injuries that are slow to heal and may be
career threateniing. Big difference, in my opinion....
Heidi
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|
    Check it Out!    
|
|
Home
Events
Groups
Rider Directory
Market
RideCamp
Stuff
Back to TOC