Fwd: RC: my last words

[BMcCrary27@aol.com]

In a message dated 04/10/2000 8:21:38 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
guest@endurance.net writes:
 
 << I do feel that the AERC should have stood behind the decision of the ride 
manager. >>
 
 AERC DID stand behind the ride manager.  The RM decided to award completion 
only, no placings.  The P&G committee upheld the RM viewpoint and denied the 
rider's appeal for her placing to be restored.  In what way did AERC not 
stand behind the RM decision? Please clarify.... (Re-read page 20 in January 
EN.)
 
 Barbara 


---- Begin included message ----

• To: guest@endurance.net
• Subject: Re: RC: my last words
• From: BMcCrary27@aol.com
• Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 01:18:12 EDT
• Full-name: BMcCrary27

In a message dated 04/10/2000 8:21:38 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
guest@endurance.net writes:

<< I do feel that the AERC should have stood behind the decision of the ride 
manager. >>

AERC DID stand behind the ride manager.  The RM decided to award completion 
only, no placings.  The P&G committee upheld the RM viewpoint and denied the 
rider's appeal for her placing to be restored.  In what way did AERC not 
stand behind the RM decision? Please clarify.... (Re-read page 20 in January 
EN.)

Barbara

---- End included message ----