|
    Check it Out!    
|
|
RideCamp@endurance.net
[Date Prev]  [Date Next]  
[Thread Prev]  [Thread Next]  [Date Index]  [Thread Index]  [Author Index]  [Subject Index]
Re: LD question
In a message dated 98-04-03 18:48:28 EST, paus@micoks.net writes:
<< I know we all ride because we like to and prizes aren't what keeps us
coming, however, prizes or ribbons do help people feel good about what
they've accomplished. >>
For the novice rider, it is nice to have a standard with which to judge one's
performance relative to that of other riders, and I agree, the BC sort of
format is more appropriate than the time standard. That is why I like the CTR
format for novices--it is like multiple BC scores all added up. It isn't
necessarily WHAT one gets for a prize as much as it is being able to evaluate
what you have done. That is why for ALL distances I announce all the BC
scores. It is pretty obvious why someone has a low score if they were an hour
behind and 50 pounds lighter, and if they had a really spiffy vet score, I
make a point of saying so. By the same token, when somebody wins the ride and
has a BC score 200 points lower than the BC winner, that makes a pretty heavy
statement, too. (Guess this is my personal way of "shunning"....LOL!) I
ALWAYS announce who got the highest vet score, and sometimes also the runners-
up, if they were close.
Heidi
Home
Events
Groups
Rider Directory
Market
RideCamp
Stuff
Back to TOC