Events
Groups
Rider Directory
Market
RideCamp
Stuff
I just started getting that message too! The last few posts (I think it
started when I replyed about Truman's filly) this message has come to
me. Where does the problem lie, Steph?
>
> >From: Administrator@obgyn-po.obgyn.uiowa.edu
> >Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 06:56:08 -0600
> >
> >Not deliverable to: HimmelreichL
> >Received: by pink-floyd.uiowa.edu (cc:Mail translation to SMTP)
> > on Sat Dec 20 06:53:00 1997
> >From: Administrator@obgyn-po.obgyn.uiowa.edu
> >To: SSY <polstar@hutchtel.net>
> >Date: Sat, 20 Dec 97 06:52 CST
> >Subject: Message not deliverable
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED;
> > boundary="-boundary:=567067980-8365=:boundary"
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
> >
> >This is the preamble of a multipart message.
> >Mail readers that understand multipart format should
> >ignore this preamble. If you are reading this text,
> >you might want to consider changing to a mail reader
> >that understands how to properly display multipart messages.
> >
> >---boundary:=567067980-8365=:boundary
> >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
> >
> >----------------------------------- Returned
> >-----------------------------------
> >From: SSY <polstar@hutchtel.net> at internet
> >Date: 12/20/97 6:19AM
> >To: HimmelreichL at obgyn-po
> >*To: ridecamp@endurance.net at internet
> >Subject: Re: Q re Sports Saddle
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >---boundary:=567067980-8365=:boundary
> >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
> >
> >Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 04:23:06 -0800 (PST)
> >In-Reply-To:
> > <Pine.LNX.3.91.971219202331.12949B-100000@consider.theneteffect.com>
> >Resent-Message-ID: <"Y5MiQ3.0.D84.ZQxcq"@starfish>
> >Resent-From: ridecamp@endurance.net
> >X-Mailing-List: <ridecamp@endurance.net> archive/latest/4685
> >X-Loop: ridecamp@endurance.net
> >Precedence: list
> >Resent-Sender: ridecamp-request@endurance.net
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >-
> >Dear Glenda and Lakota
> >
> >Check the IBM Patent search or US Patent over the internet. (Sports Saddle
> >or Bob Marshal (sp) It will give you a clear picture of how the saddle was
> >designed. I did this before buying a couple of them. Believe there have
> >been improvements since the patent? It is still good art work..
> >Need help let me know...................
> >
> >Sigrid
> >
> >The Space Cadet
> >
> >*******************************************************************************
> >*
> >*
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>The talk of standing in the stirrups of an OF saddle, and the
> >>possibility that it causes problems <bg>, reminded me of a question I've
> >>had in mind recently with respect to the Sports Saddle.
> >>
> >>With no true tree in the saddle (if I understand correctly), the stirrups
> >>are somehow attached to the middle part of the saddle, which is soft
> >>padding. (I've been reading the websites.) Knowing that endurance riders
> >>spend many hours standing up, with some or all of the rider's weight on
> >>the stirrups, in varying degrees, for hours and hours ... how does the
> >>weight distribution vary with a SS as opposed to a normal saddle with
> >>tree? It is my understanding, from previous posts on this list, that
> >>standing in the stirrups distributes the rider's weight across the entire
> >>tree, thus on a broader portion of the horse's back. So, on a treeless
> >>saddle, how is the weight distributed across the horse's back when the
> >>rider is standing in the stirrups? Would standing in the stirrups a lot
> >>reduce the longevity of this saddle?
> >>
> >>Curious as always :)
> >>
> >>Glenda & Lakota
> >
> >---boundary:=567067980-8365=:boundary--
> >
Events
Groups
Rider Directory
Market
RideCamp
Stuff