Truman wrote...
>Interestingly enough this is not always the case.
I'll keep this part of the post short for fear of being scolded for
getting off topic! :) True but except for relatively small fields of
work (though now aday wide reaching) it is unusual to see the average
engineer including the Lorentz transformation in his work - not even a
railroad engineer. :)
Truman wrote
>Until the time we have such questions answered, it may be prudent to base
>the diet of an endurance horse on the knowledge gained by the experienced
>riders and vets in the sport. While this may not be scientific, most
>scientific theories are developed by intutition gained through observation
>and a lot of hard work - or to quote "5% inspration and 95% prespiration"
Agreed, I don't think that we can progress scientifically in this case,
but should we give up? We prudently base our diets on what works. But if
there is a possibility of improvement, should we not add our
perspiration (but hopefully not the health and well-being of our horses)
to the lake? Incidentally, you wouldn't happen to know where to look for
what those East coasters did?
Nicco
-- Nicco Murphy Aerostructures Inc. F/A-18 Group, San Diego, (619)545-3333