Thanks for another interesting topic. The tenative sponsor of the
proposed event is NUTRAMAX Laboratories, Inc., makers of Cosequin for
animals and Cosamin for humans.
A high stakes endurance race has many facets. To those happy with the
status quo it may represent a threat to the tradition and stability of
"their" sport. To others it may mean a welcome increase in media
visibility, prestige, expense reimbursement, etc. Some may not care
either way.
Whatever one's perspective, there is a need to address two issues
before such a mega-race takes place. The first relates to the functions
of the AERC Steward; the second, to the AERC Rules themselves.
Just what "exactly" is an AERC Steward's role at such events? No
widely published document details the duties, responsibilities and
authority of an AERC steward. This person's role may need
clarification. For example, is such a person to be the final on-scene
arbiter of AERC rules interpretation and application? Of course there
is the AERC protest process, but what exactly can the steward do to
prevent the need for formal action. Further, can one person handle the
job or is an FEI-type ground jury/appeals committee needed?
A final note on stewards. The American Horse Shows Association (AHSA)
has been trying for some time to require an AHSA steward at AERC rides.
Thus far, our Board and our AHSA representative has successfully
prevented such a requirement. What, if any, effect might big money
races have on the AHSA initive?
The second issue involves AERC rules and regulations. As AERC
celebrates its 25th year, there seems to be on-going debate in board and
committee meetings, written articles and at rides as to whether fewer
rules, "flexibly" applied are better than more rules written in clear,
precise terms. If mega-dollars are on the line some close calls are
bound to occur. Do current AERC rules and regulations adequately set-up
a "level playing field" for such high stakes endurance competitions?
Comments and opinions anyone?