<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] Motion #4
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:32:31 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: RE: Fw: [RC] 3 day 150 mi. Rides
  • - Bob Morris
  • Prev by Date: RE: [RC] Bailing off a runaway horse
  • - Karen Standefer

    Re: [RC] Motion #4 - Michael Maul


    Karen,
    
    First if the ride gets sanctioned soon - before dec - then it's unlikely
    the motion would apply.  There are already rides sanctioned for 2003 and
    I don't see us redoing these rides.
    
    Second - the motion may not pass or it may not take effect until 2004.
    
    Just to be sure - I would get the ride sanctioned sometime soon.
    
    Mike
    
    
    Karen wrote:
    > 
    > Date of motion: July 2002
    > Effective Date: December 2002
    > 
    > So, basically if this motion gets passed the Cuyama 3-day ride in
    > California ride could not happen because it is in March, only 3 months
    > after the December 2002 "effective date", which means that it could
    > not get special sanctioning because that has to be done 180 days (or 6
    > months) in advance.  This isn't in the best interest of the
    > riders!!!   How silly to implement a rule change that will wipe out a
    > successful ride (this one turned away a lot of people last year
    > because basecamp can only handle so many).
    > 
    > Maybe Mike Maul or Steph can explain how this will work?  (thanks)
    > 
    > k
    
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    

    Replies
    [RC] Motion #4, Karen