NEWS & MESSAGES

05/04 15/02

 

 

In this letter you’ll find

§         World Wide Rankings 2003

§         Team Performances: Senior World Championships 1998 - 2002

§         Team Performances: European Championships 1999 – 2003

§          

§         Message from Desirée Hanen, NED

 

 

§         World Wide Rankings 2003

 

nations sorted in order of appearance

 

A = this nation was represented as a team at the WEG 2002

B = this nation was represented as a team at the J/YR World Championship 2003

 

 

A

B

1st  - 100th

place WWR

101st –500th

place WWR

601st –1000th place WWR

1001st –1590th place WWR

Total

 

FRA

x

x

29

64

86

159

338

UAE

x

x

16

 23

20

13

72

MAS

x

 

1

5

3

1

10

AUS

x

 

7

25

43

48

123

BEL

x

x

4

9

15

6

34

ESP

x

x

5

26

27

26

84

NZL

x

 

8

22

15

23

68

USA

x

 

11

53

49

21

134

ITA

x

x

3

9

28

25

65

ARG

x

 

5

20

16

73

114

CHI

x

 

1

7

12

13

33

AUT

x

x

1

1

2

14

18

BRN

 

x

1

10

11

22

44

GER

x

x

5

16

20

16

57

BRA

x

x

1

14

20

18

53

GBR

x

x

1

21

21

27

70

POL

 

x

1

2

8

0

11

IND

 

 

1

1

4

6

12

CAN

x

 

0

7

3

5

15

DEN

 

 

0

3

2

4

9

SUI

x

x

0

6

10

5

21

CZE

 

 

0

3

1

5

9

IRL

x

x

0

5

3

4

12

RSA

 

 

0

12

23

7

42

NED

 

 

0

6

3

15

24

POR

x

 

0

10

3

0

13

NAM

 

 

0

5

10

12

27

KSA

 

 

0

1

1

0

2

 

GRE

 

 

0

1

0

0

1

NOR

x

 

0

2

3

0

5

SWE

x

 

0

3

7

2

12

PAK

 

 

0

1

0

2

3

BOT

 

 

0

1

1

4

6

BAN

 

 

0

1

1

0

2

RUS

x

 

0

3

4

1

8

LUX

 

 

0

1

1

1

3

QAT

x

 

0

2

9

5

16

URU

x

x

0

1

1

1

3

JPN

 

 

0

1

1

5

7

TUR

 

 

0

0

1

0

1

RUM

 

 

0

0

1

0

1

ALG

 

 

0

0

1

0

1

RSM

 

 

0

0

1

0

1

EGY

 

 

0

0

1

2

3

KUW

 

 

0

0

1

6

7

MAR

 

 

0

0

0

2

2

JOR

x

 

0

0

0

3

3

FIN

 

 

0

0

0

1

1

GUA

x

 

0

0

0

1

1

SUD

 

 

0

0

0

2

2

TUN

 

 

0

0

0

4

4

DOM ?

 

 

0

0

0

2

2


           

 

 

 

 

 

 


§         Team Performances: Senior World Championships 1998 - 2002

 

 

represented as team

team ranking

nbr of top 20 rankings

(team & individual)

1998

2000

2002

1998

2000

2002

1998

2000

2002

 

ARG

x

?

x

4

0

8

1

0

0

AUS

x

x

x

3

1

3

2

3

2

AUT

 

 

x

 

 

0

0

0

0

BEL

x

x

x

5

6

11

0

2

1

BRA

x

x

x

6

8

15

0

0

0

CAN

x

?

x

0

9

0

1

0

0

CHI

x

?

x

0

0

0

0

0

0

COL

x

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

DEN

x

x

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

ESP

x

x

x

13

0

4

1

1

2

FIN

x

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

FRA

x

x

x

12

4

1

2

7

5

GBR

x

x

x

7

2

9

0

2

1

GER

x

x

x

10

7

6

0

1

1

GUA

 

 

x

 

 

0

 

 

0

HUN

 

x

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

IRL

 

x

x

 

0

0

 

0

0

ITA

x

x

x

0

0

2

1

0

2

JOR

x

x

x

8

0

0

0

0

0

JPN

x

 

 

0

 

 

1

 

 

KSA

x

x

 

0

0

 

0

1

(1)

LIB

x

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

MAR

x

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

MAS

x

 

x

0

 

0

0

 

0

MEX

 

?

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

NED

x

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

NOR

 

 

x

 

 

0

 

 

0

NZL

x

x

x

1

0

10

0

0

0

POL

x

?

 

16

0

 

0

0

 

POR

x

x

x

14

10

7

0

0

0

QAT

x

 

x

0

 

16

1

 

0

RSA

x

 

 

0

 

 

1

 

 

RUS

x

x

x

0

0

0

0

0

0

SUI

x

x

x

15

0

13

0

0

0

SWE

x

x

x

9

3

14

0

0

0

SYR

x

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

TUN

x

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

UAE

x

x

x

11

5

0

6

2

2

URU

x

?

x

0

0

12

0

0

0

USA

x

x

x

2

0

5

3

1

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Remarkable :

Australia with 3 Team Medals during the last 3 World Championships

BEL, BRA, FRA, GBR, GER, POR, SWE 3 times in the team rankings.       

 

§         Team Performances: European Championships 1999 – 2003

...

 

 

 


WEG JEREZ

 

0)Completing this event was perfectly feasible; several of the bigger teams did so in excellent conditions. For example, of the 7 French horses, 5 were amongst the top 12, 2 were retired unhurt, none required treatment, and the next day, none was lame and none showed any discernible signs of having undertaken such an effort the previous day.

 

0)Even if a veterinary control were imposed every 5 kms, incompetence and madness would still take their toll.

The only measure that is truly preventive is the qualification standard required. It’s up to the FEI to raise the existing standard and impose it.

For example, I have been saying for years that the acceptance of hired or borrowed horses in the last weeks before an event is contrary to the equine code of rights ( ? ? ? ?) ; I warned in 1998 : « Beware ! This is crimimal ». We all know the outcome…

 

0)We love our horses, we work hard and we’re very demanding; we shouldn’t have to put up with more controls because of the actions of incompetent or self-seeking participants. It is they who must improve and be taught to love and respect their horses and their sport.

By fixing appropriate qualifying standards, the FEI has the means not to encourage mediocrity and its ravages at this high level of competition.

 

0)Our refusal of greater veterinary control and shorter events and loops is based on 25 years of experience and on the fact that shorter loops, and shorter events, are known to make it easier for mediocre riders to participate, to increase the overall speed and to oblige the best riders to go at a much faster pace in order to impose themselves. The FLORAC Endurance championship  had 4 vet gates and the best accident-free results in 20 years…

 

 

We cannot agree with the idea that there would have been no problem had there  been more vet gates:

 

ØIt’s wrong: a careful analysis of the 2 mortality cases will prove this.

 

ØIt’s tendential: it’s a self-serving argument by those in favour of more vet gates and shorter distances. Who are they? What have they achieved?

 

 

 

 

 

Let me conclude with 3 questions :

 

-Is it not time to listen to experience and prevailing knowledge and consult the exisiting statistics?

 

-Is it not time to introduce a proper grounding in training and technique, instead of  persisting in believing that Endurance is purely a question of medecine?

 

-When will it be finally understood that a World Championship is sport at its highest level - and therefore perforce an elitist event  bringing together only the very best in the world - and not a training ground or a garden party ?

 

 

 

Fond greetings; I hope we will be able all together to have truly technical discussions – I don’t doubt the good faith of the FEI Commission nor its commitment to further our sport at the highest level.

 

 

                                               Pierre CAZES

                                               Chef d’Equipe de France d’ Endurance

                                                                      (3 gold medals at World Championships/by Team)

 

 

P.S. : If Endurance becomes an Olympic sport, it will be thanks to the professionalism and quality of participants, not because of a greater  number of veterinary controls.

Let us once and for all accept the idea that only the best in the world should compete at this level (a limit of 80 or 100 entries would also increase the event’s media impact and make life a lot easier for the organizers).

CONGRATULATIONS to the organizers of JEREZ 2002, it was a grand and memorable event.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FRANCE (TOULOUSE) - 11-12 janvier 2003 - Hôtel NOVOTEL Centre

La Fédération Française d'Equitation organise une réunion-débat sur l'Endurance Internationale.

Invitations :

- par courrier : chaque N.F sera invitée à déléguer son Chef d'Equipe et tout responsable Endurance qu'elle désirera envoyer.

- par internet : Tout cavalier international sera informé et invité à participer.

- par courrier : Les membres de la Commission FEI seront invités par la FFE.

Objectifs:

- création association mondiale des cavaliers et chefs d'Equipe d'Endurance

- debriefing année 2002 et WEG

- rédaction d'une liste de propositions règlementaires à la FEI

Charges :

- Les salles de réunions et moyens nécessaires ainsi que les buffets seront offerts par la FFE.

- Les participants auront à leur charge le déplacement et les chambres d'hôtel hormis les invités de la Présidente de la FFE

Organisation des débats :

- L'ordre du jour sera envoyé à chaque participant par mail 8 jours avant la réunion.

- Certains points seront soumis à un vote.

- Chaque pays aura une voix.

(traductions Anglais-Français)

Préinscriptions avant le 20/12/2002 : Suzanne DOLLINGER (par mail ou fax)

 

 

represented as team

team ranking

nbr of top 10 rankings

(team & individual)

1999

2001

2003

1999

2001

2003

1999

2001

2003

 

AUT

 

x

 

 

6

 

 

0

 

BEL

x

 

x

6

 

0

1

 

1

ESP

x

x

x

7

5

0

3

3

1

FRA

x

x

x

5

0

1

3

2

4

GBR

x

x

x

2

4

0

0

1

0

GER

x

x

x

4

3

4

0

0

2

IRL

 

 

x

 

 

0

 

 

0

ITA

x

x

x

0

1

0

2

1

0

NED

 

 

x

 

 

3

 

 

1

POR

x

x

x

1

2

2

1

1

1

RUS

 

x

x

 

0

0

 

0

0

SUI

x

x

 

3

0

 

0

1

 

SWE

x

x

x

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Remarkable :

Portugal with 3 Team Medals during the last 3 European Championships

Germany 3 times in the team rankings.   

 

 

§         Message from Desiree Hanen, NED

 

Many of us have a subscribtion to Endurance World Magazine. It looks like since the September/October issue no magazines have been published anymore.

E-mails I sent to different addresses at Endurance World have been replied by an automated reply only. No further reaction/information from their end so far.

I checked with several people and it appears that it is not only my problem, but that indeed none of them received any issues for half a year.

Did anyone of you receive any? Does somebody know more on the backgrounds of why we didn't receive any new issues of Endurance World Magazine?

6 months of waiting is in my opinion long enough. I think action is required now to make them aware they should continue publishing of Endurance World and not
only cashing the money for it.

It would be a shame if this magazine would be allowed to vanish just like that. In my opinion this glossy magazine can be seen as a valuable tool for the exchange of information on endurance around the world and as mature promotion material on our sports.

Please send your reactions to me by e-mail: opgenbusschelen@yahoo.com

Regards, Desiree Hanen, The Netherlands