Re: Wilderness Designations

["steven proe" <trails@jps.net>]

Hi: If you fail to look at my reply in total and choose to overlook the
methods that OUR management agencies have supposedly cared for OUR lands i/e
stripped them of resources then traded or sold/exchanged them off We deserve
what we have sowed by the APATHY that abounds in the equestrian community.
steven
----- Original Message -----
From: <CMKSAGEHIL@aol.com>
To: <trails@jps.net>; <cberto@juno.com>
Cc: <ridecamp@endurance.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 1999 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: Wilderness Designations


>In a message dated 2/16/99 8:02:45 PM Pacific Standard Time, trails@jps.net
>writes:
>
><<  the results are we
> do not have sufficient OPEN SPACE i/e Recreational Lands that are left to
> provide uses for our GROWING POPULATIONS. >>
><< They including myself have learned what must be done to
>preserve our Open Space including Wilderness Areas.>>
>
>The designated wilderness areas (or as Bob puts it, Wilderness with a
capital
>W) IS closed off to the growing population for uses such as recreation.
That
>is precisely why so many of us are fighting so hard to have public lands
>managed in such a way that the public can use it and enjoy it, rather than
>locking it up so that the public must get an Act of Congress to use it.
>
>Heidi
>
>