Re: Signing Posts

[guest@endurance.net]

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO GUEST@ENDURANCE.NET!!!
You must post replies to the actual sender listed below.

From: GUEST@ENDURANCE.NET 
Email: GUEST@ENDURANCE.NET

>I try to work off the basis that most >people are honest.  Perhaps some,
>as you have stated are not.  I would >think signing your posts represent
>a simple curtosy...evidently you do >not.

And I would think accepting my post unsigned without making it an issue on this listserve would be a simple curtosy...evidently you do not.

>And so my opinion stands, I will not >give an unsigned post much
>attention or credence one way or >another.

Then why are you giving my unsigned post so much attention one way or another ?

>I do believe if you want to post from >guest@ridecamp, you can sign your
>name without giving your personal >email addy.....is that not correct?
>Tracy StampkeIdaho

Yes, I could sign my name, or your name, or anyone elses name. How does that add any validity to the source or content of the message. Let's use our heads here folks.

As for Teddy's sugestion that Steph become the listserve police, yes she could do that easily, by closing the listserve to only registered and identified users. I would suggest that to those of you that desire such a partitioned and exclusive service, you make arrangements with Steph to provide that private and verfied user area and move off there, hopefully following your remittance of a subscription payment for the service.

As for the rest of us in the world, we will remain here and post (signed or unsigned at our discretion) as long as Steph is willing to put up with us.

Now can we close this stupid issue and go back to the topics Steph designed this listserve for ?

Thank You

H. Clinton
Washington D.C.
neglectedHwife@castratebill.com