Re: signing posts

[Teddy Lancaster <Teddy@runningbear.com>]

Perhaps we should suggest to Stephanie, out list administrator, that we do not wish to receive posts without identification....

Teddy

TS wrote:

> > Signing a post to give it more credence is irrelevant as I could sign anyone's name or create a new name claiming to be a newbie to the sport with whom you would have no knowledge, how would that lend credence to the content of the message?
> >
>
> I try to work off the basis that most people are honest.  Perhaps some,
> as you have stated are not.  I would think signing your posts represent
> a simple curtosy...evidently you do not.
>
> And so my opinion stands, I will not give an unsigned post much
> attention or credence one way or another.
>
> I do believe if you want to post from guest@ridecamp, you can sign your
> name without giving your personal email addy.....is that not correct?
>
> Tracy Stampke
> Idaho