PROPOSAL FOR NEW DIVISION AT NO EXPENSE TO ANYONE

[guest@endurance.net]

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO GUEST@ENDURANCE.NET!!!
You must post replies to the actual sender listed below.

From: Becky Solano 
Email: becky80621@AOL.com

Thank you Tom Van Gelder, Barbara (from TX) and Cindy Collins.  I love the Big Horn trails.  I hope I haven't attended my last endurance race, but if it was my last ride, I am ever so grateful to all of you for giving me the opportunity to ride that trail one last time.  My husband, Frank, and I have ridden trails all over the country.  We have had varied results from completions on "backyard 50's" to National rankings.  The ability to ride a horse over country inaccessible otherwise, is the reason we chose endurance.  The people who have become fast friends over the years is the reason we wish to continue in endurance.  
    I am not proud of it, nor am I ashamed of it, but it is mine.  I have MS.  Riding is terribly difficult for me, but yet, terribly rewarding. 
    Why can't the AERC and its members get behind a PHYSCIALLY CHALLENGED DIVISION?
    My closest friends ride hundreds and fifty's.  I love to ride with them.  I propose that I be allowed to ride with them, accompany them, as far as I am physically able, then, upon my terminating that particular ride (which I will do every thing humanly possible to ensure it is at a Vet Check) I and my horse get CREDIT for the miles completed.  I don't care about completion awards/points, weight division awards/points, etc.  I would love to ride with my friends.  I have at least four people right now who would ride with me just to ride with me over beautiful trails.  For us, the ride is the award and would continue to be. Only those previously designated "PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED" by AERC could get mileage credit for rides "not completed".
    At the Big Horn I was helped off my horse, who was receiving straight "A's" all ride-long at 39 miles. He could, I couldn't.  Thoughts?  Becky S.