|
    Check it Out!    
|
|
RideCamp@endurance.net
[Date Prev]  [Date Next]  
[Thread Prev]  [Thread Next]  [Date Index]  [Thread Index]  [Author Index]  [Subject Index]
Re: Minimum Weight Rules
On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 10:03:50 -0500 "Carlos F. Crespo" <ccrespo@nigma.com>
writes:
>Endurance is the only sport I know where the first ten to finish are
>considered "winners". This has never made much sense to me. I think
>that it
>would be far more equitable to maintain the competition within its
>corresponding classes, in this way you would have first, second and
>third
>place finishers and medal winners in each weight class instead of ten
>overall winners. This approach would produce more competition , more
>participation and a hell of a bigger thrill. I am all for the Ali Vs
>Frazier contests in lieu of Ali Vs Sugar Ray.
>
>Carlos Crespo
>Florida
>ccrespo@nigma.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
I don't know what endurance organization you are observing, Carlos. AERC
does recognize the weight divisions. I can't even remember the last time
I went to a ride that recognized Top-10. Around here and in the AERC
overall awards, the placings are by weight division.
Lindavan
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Home
Events
Groups
Rider Directory
Market
RideCamp
Stuff
Back to TOC