Re: AERC Completion Time Rule Feedback

[Ramey Peticolas-Stroud <ramey@wvi.com>]

Whoa there pardner, back up some...

My orginal analysis was about the meaning of some "words" on a piece of
paper (the text of the rule), not historic BoD policy. 

In that contex, the rule is ambiguous and this thread is clear and
convincing evidence of the fact.

Ramey

Joe Long wrote:

> I'd like to point out, again, that Ramey is mistaken.  The AERC Board
> does not consider 6.1 as allowing awarding a completion to a rider who
> does not meet the time criteria, no matter what the reason.  This is
> clear from discussions in Board meetings.  The black&white rationale
> for denying the application of 6.1 is that making the time longer
> prima facia makes the course easier.