Re: Fw: Fwd: Horse licensing

[Nancy DuPont <htrails@earthlink.net>]

George siad that the city of Glendale, Burbank California had a licensing
taxing of horses for some 50 years. Last reports were that the people like
it. At least 2 staff people administer it So the horses have 2 people at
City Hall whose job depends on horses. 
As you know, Glendale is one of the few places on the planet at least in
California that still allow horses on quarter acres lots in city suburbs.
With trails protected.

At 09:55 AM 11/23/98 -0000, you wrote:
>AHEM CAN YOU ELABORATE ON THAT?
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nancy DuPont <htrails@earthlink.net>
>To: BOB SVEDEEN <bobsvedeen@shasta.com>
>Date: Monday, November 23, 1998 5:38 AM
>Subject: Re: Fwd: Horse licensing
>
>
>>confirmed.
>>
>>At 12:18 PM 11/22/98 -0000, you wrote:
>>>THIS ONLY APPLIES  TO APPLICATIONS FOR A PERMIT TO BUILD A NEW STABLE
>PLS
>>>CONFIRM MESSAGE RECIEVED TKS    BOB SVEDEEN
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Nancy DuPont <htrails@earthlink.net>
>>>To: LSimoni197@aol.com <LSimoni197@aol.com>
>>>Cc: bobsvedeen@shasta.com <bobsvedeen@shasta.com>
>>>Date: Sunday, November 22, 1998 4:44 AM
>>>Subject: Re: Fwd: Horse licensing
>>>
>>>
>>>>Lyngie, please keep Bob Svedeen informed, he is our CSHA trails chairman.
>>>>
>>>>At 01:55 AM 11/21/98 EST, you wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>From: JeWillie@aol.com
>>>>>Return-path: <JeWillie@aol.com>
>>>>>To: LSimoni197@aol.com
>>>>>Subject: Re:  Horse licensing
>>>>>Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 22:07:06 EST
>>>>>Mime-Version: 1.0
>>>>>Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>>>>>Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
>>>>>
>>>>>Lynge,
>>>>>
>>>>>I am forwarding the following info on horse licensing.  Disturbing
>trend.
>>>Do
>>>>>you have any input on trying to head this off?
>>>>>
>>>>>dex        Horse Licensing Now Starting in California
>>>>>>>>     The Animal Welfare Council reports that a disturbing precedent
>has
>>>>>>>>been set in San Mateo County and the town of Woodside -- both located
>>>in
>>>>>>>>California.   They have enacted the first laws in the nation that
>>>require
>>>>>>>>licensing of horses.   San Mateo County Ordinance Sec. 7700,
>>>"Maintenance
>>>>>>>>of Horses," requires a permit application fee of $1,262, filing of an
>>>>>>>>environmental information form, proof of property ownership, a list
>of
>>>>>>>>people living within 300 feet of the horse owner's property, a
>location
>>>>>>>>map, site map, building elevations and a permit review, which takes
>>>>>>>>approximately 3-5 months. The permit, if approved, further requires
>an
>>>>>>>>annual site inspection and renewal at a cost of $208 for up to two
>>>>>>>>horses, with each additional horse costing $22.   The Woodside
>>>ordinance
>>>>>>>>requires an annual fee of $7 plus $20 per individual horse.  This may
>>>be
>>>>>>>>one of the first actions as a result of the recent Horse Slaughter
>Act
>>>>>>>>which recently passed in California, and which many opponents said
>woul
>>>d
>>>>>>>>end up being non-beneficial to horse owners in California.   For
>>>further
>>>>>>>>information, please contact the Animal Welfare Council at
>817/598-1581.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>Judy Williams
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>