Check it Out!     |
[Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] |
[Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Author Index] | [Subject Index] |
>On the three rides I've done most recently, the trot-out areas for vet check were totally unrepresentative of the terrain on the ride. My horse was unshod because I had called ahead and checked with ride managers who said the rides were all dirt, no rocks or pavement. I had been conditioning the horse unshod all season. To make a long story short, the terrain on the trot out (for initial and intra-ride checks)was on paved or large-gravel drives, and my horse short stepped on the pavement because she's always paranoid of slipping, and gimped on the sharp gravel. Throughout the rides she was fit and smooth under me and to the appearance of other riders, but I always got lameness grades at the checks because of this odd terrain. Is this really fair? Shouldn't the trot-out terrain be representative of the course? >What do you guys (anyone who reads this) think? > It's not a matter of fairness. The trot out area is not picked because it is or is not representative of the type of footing on the course you are riding. Often, there are limited areas along a course that will accommodate a vet check so once the vet check is established, an area is picked that has even footing and sometimes that happens to be on a gravel road, and sometimes it's on pavement, but unfortunately ride management has to work with what it's given. Terry Woolley Howe San Diego
    Check it Out!     |