ridecamp@endurance.net: Need help with list problems again...

Need help with list problems again...

SSY (polstar@hutchtel.net)
Sat, 20 Dec 1997 07:25:22 -0600

Hi List Keeper or any body

Do you know why I get this when I send an e-mail to ride camp? Remember
when This started hapening to me befor..........and the list went beserk...
Just trying to nip a problem in the bud...
Sigrid

The Space Cadett
****************************************************************

>From: Administrator@obgyn-po.obgyn.uiowa.edu
>Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 06:56:08 -0600
>
>Not deliverable to: HimmelreichL
>Received: by pink-floyd.uiowa.edu (cc:Mail translation to SMTP)
> on Sat Dec 20 06:53:00 1997
>From: Administrator@obgyn-po.obgyn.uiowa.edu
>To: SSY <polstar@hutchtel.net>
>Date: Sat, 20 Dec 97 06:52 CST
>Subject: Message not deliverable
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED;
> boundary="-boundary:=567067980-8365=:boundary"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
>
>This is the preamble of a multipart message.
>Mail readers that understand multipart format should
>ignore this preamble. If you are reading this text,
>you might want to consider changing to a mail reader
>that understands how to properly display multipart messages.
>
>---boundary:=567067980-8365=:boundary
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
>
>----------------------------------- Returned
>-----------------------------------
>From: SSY <polstar@hutchtel.net> at internet
>Date: 12/20/97 6:19AM
>To: HimmelreichL at obgyn-po
>*To: ridecamp@endurance.net at internet
>Subject: Re: Q re Sports Saddle
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>---boundary:=567067980-8365=:boundary
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
>
>Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 04:23:06 -0800 (PST)
>In-Reply-To:
> <Pine.LNX.3.91.971219202331.12949B-100000@consider.theneteffect.com>
>Resent-Message-ID: <"Y5MiQ3.0.D84.ZQxcq"@starfish>
>Resent-From: ridecamp@endurance.net
>X-Mailing-List: <ridecamp@endurance.net> archive/latest/4685
>X-Loop: ridecamp@endurance.net
>Precedence: list
>Resent-Sender: ridecamp-request@endurance.net
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-
>Dear Glenda and Lakota
>
>Check the IBM Patent search or US Patent over the internet. (Sports Saddle
>or Bob Marshal (sp) It will give you a clear picture of how the saddle was
>designed. I did this before buying a couple of them. Believe there have
>been improvements since the patent? It is still good art work..
>Need help let me know...................
>
>Sigrid
>
>The Space Cadet
>
>*******************************************************************************
>*
>*
>
>
>
>
>>The talk of standing in the stirrups of an OF saddle, and the
>>possibility that it causes problems <bg>, reminded me of a question I've
>>had in mind recently with respect to the Sports Saddle.
>>
>>With no true tree in the saddle (if I understand correctly), the stirrups
>>are somehow attached to the middle part of the saddle, which is soft
>>padding. (I've been reading the websites.) Knowing that endurance riders
>>spend many hours standing up, with some or all of the rider's weight on
>>the stirrups, in varying degrees, for hours and hours ... how does the
>>weight distribution vary with a SS as opposed to a normal saddle with
>>tree? It is my understanding, from previous posts on this list, that
>>standing in the stirrups distributes the rider's weight across the entire
>>tree, thus on a broader portion of the horse's back. So, on a treeless
>>saddle, how is the weight distributed across the horse's back when the
>>rider is standing in the stirrups? Would standing in the stirrups a lot
>>reduce the longevity of this saddle?
>>
>>Curious as always :)
>>
>>Glenda & Lakota
>
>---boundary:=567067980-8365=:boundary--
>

Home Events Groups Rider Directory Market RideCamp Stuff