ridecamp@endurance.net: Re: best condition

Re: best condition

DreamWeaver (karen@chaton.gardnerville.nv.us)
Sat, 06 Sep 1997 15:11:23 -0700

At 03:09 PM 9/6/97 -0700, you wrote:
>Nikki,
> I agree there should be less emphasis and on weight and time and more on
>vet card scores also.

I agree. I think that a horse receiving Best Condition should be the horse
that is 'most fit to continue'. Meaning, that horse could go out and do
the ride again. I can think of several instances where this has not been
the case; though maybe I am mis-interpreting that best condition means.

At a
>couple of rides, besides best condition, the ride management decided to
>give a high vet score award (within the top ten riders). It was very well
>received. The vets in particular seemed to like giving out that award. It
>rewards riders for riding within their horse's limit instead of exceeding
>it.

That sounds like an excellent idea!

I too, have seen riders kicking and whipping their horses down the trail.
Some of the front-runners are very competetive. I've seen them do all
sorts of (unethical) things. Not everybody plays fair. Sad, but true.

My vote would be to somehow lessen the time/weight factor somehow so that
it would be virtually impossible for someone whose horse is trashed to
accumulate enough points to win.

k

Home Events Groups Rider Directory Market RideCamp Stuff