It is apparent that all of you have great affection for your horses and 
the sport of endurance riding.It is a great sport but like all others,it 
will expierience continuous  pains and controversy as long as it's 
around.Lets hope sound logic prevails!
Perhaps it would be prudent for everyone to take a few steps back and 
re-asess individual priorities and objectives from two perspectives-ours 
and those of 
our mounts.Trail riding should be fun,and it is,for all(including 
horses).What I see here is a great conflab over the use of 'drugs' 
'enhancers''nutrients' and all sorts of rocket fuels etc.
(mostly for the horses)coupled with the possible injection of prize- 
money into an organized amateur sport.What a combination! Sound 
familiar?
Why not ask 
a horse how much fun he has had during the last 10 miles of a 50 or the 
last 30 or so miles of a 100? Ask him where the fine line is- between 
enjoying and enduring .Endurance to the extreme is only a worthy goal in 
the minds of some humans.All animals avoid it unless it is a matter of 
life and death.A spent animal is too vulnerable.Yet in some cases we are 
asking ,even demanding,that our mounts commit to this 'goal'on a fairly 
routine basis, for purposes that only we can attempt to comprehend. 
Ego seems to be a major player in the program here. Chances 
are,-although slim-that if the horses could call the shots,they would 
opt for more fun and less stress,strain and pain.Definitly no fuels or 
drugs.!Artificial aids would be out -entirely!Nothing but good grass or 
hay and fresh clean water.If they can't make it on that without any ill 
effects ,then somebody or something is pushing them beyond a natural 
limit. So I have to ask, why the controversy? Any horse has the 
anwser-especially an endurance horse.
.  
 
 
They would probably ask us for no more than good food,water,lodging, 
quality excercise,some work to do and companionship.If some
 endurance riders were forced to trade places with their mounts for just 
one major event, my bet is the entry field would be very small.I raise 
horses (Arabs) and also maintain a separate pack -string as part of my 
outfit,so I'm not butting in here as any bleeding heart.Horses love to 
work and mine get their share.
Horses dont have a clue about winning,placing or passing vet checks.They 
just do
 the best they can-for us. 
I'm not against against organized trail or endurance by any means.It 
just seems that perspective is being lost and the main participants
(the horses) are the ones who are going to  get the 'short end' in the 
'long haul.
 
In sum,(then I'll shut up) when controversy arises over issues such as 
those being discussed here ,something very BASIC is wrong and it's not 
with the horses! 
Keep  the FUN in fundamental.
   
                                         Gord 
                                         Alberta,Canada