ridecamp@endurance.net: Re: [endurance] Re: saddle?

Re: [endurance] Re: saddle?

HorseWorks@aol.com
Mon, 24 Jun 1996 14:20:54 -0400

You wrote:

>>> I am confused as to why I might want a saddle with no
tree (or a flexible tree for that matter), my understanding is that the
whole point of a tree is to provide some rigidity to the saddle and
therefore more evenly distribute the weight of the rider across the
horse's back. Otherwise I would just ride in a "bareback" pad. I have
always been quite happy with a well made wooden tree. The wood provides
plenty enough flexibility for me.>>>>>

You may be happy with the traditional wooden tree, but is your horse? A
traditional wooden tree is NOT flexible by any means. However, there are
some trees being made nowdays that have some flexibility. None as flexible,
though, as the Sports Saddle.

The design of the Sports Saddle DOES offer weight distribution. However,
that doesn't mean someone won't have a problem with weight distribution.
Whether in a traditional saddle or a Sports Saddle, weight distribution has
a lot to do with how the rider distributes their weight when riding.

The reason there are so many different saddles on the market is because there
are so many different people and different horses to satisfy. And, for some,
it is just personal preference.

If you have further questions, email me personally and I'll be glad to answer
your questions.

Genie Stewart-Spears
Distributor for the Endurance Sports Saddle