ridecamp@endurance.net: RE: [endurance] [larishea@mcn.org: Australia riding vacation]

RE: [endurance] [larishea@mcn.org: Australia riding vacation]

Chrisman, Kenneth R. (Kenneth.Chrisman@wellsfargo.com)
Thu, 31 Aug 95 10:31:00 PDT

Is this right?
----------
From: owner-endurance
Subject: RE: [endurance] [larishea@mcn.org: Australia riding vacation]
Date: Thursday, August 31, 1995 8:27AM

Return-Path: <owner-endurance@moscow.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 08:27:15 +0800
Message-Id: <9508311527.AA17004@sunfish.fsr.com>
From: "Chrisman, Kenneth R." <Kenneth.Chrisman@wellsfargo.com>
Subject: RE: [endurance] [larishea@mcn.org: Australia riding vacation]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 626
Apparently-To: endurance@moscow.com
Sender: owner-endurance@moscow.com
Precedence: list
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
How competitive is this? OR can common trail riders go on this trip as
well?

[List Manager's Note: Please, please, please remember to send your replies
to
the list address (endurance@moscow.com) instead of the owner- address.
Also,
a couple of -digest subscribers have mentioned the number of replies with
in-
appropriate includes. This message is a perfect example, (not to pick on
you,
Kenneth) the original message was about 45 lines long. The Subject: line
and
reply convey all that needs to be said. (then I go and mess it all up...)
-- bengt bnorum@fsr.com ]